COMP <GO>
LULU vs AS // OPERATING MARGIN
lululemon athletica inc. (NASDAQ) VS. Amer Sports Inc. (NYSE) • 15-METRIC TALLY: LULU 8
— AS 3
▲ OPERATING MARGIN LEADER: LULU
LAST: $107.83 (+0.55%) • MKT CAP: $11.32B
operating-margins
19.90%
LAST: $30.67 (+4.21%) • MKT CAP: $16.41B
operating-margins
13.90%
15-METRIC INSTITUTIONAL SIDE-BY-SIDE SCORECARD (LULU VS. AS)
EMERALD CELL = QUANTITATIVE EDGE
| INSTITUTIONAL METRIC | LULU | AS | SPREAD (A - B) | ADVANTAGE | DEDICATED URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 56.60% | — | — | TIE | /gross-margins <GO> |
| Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) | 32.30% | 9.90% | +22.40 | LULU | /roic <GO> |
| EV/EBITDA & P/E Valuation | 4.3x | 21.0x | -16.70 | LULU | /valuation <GO> |
| Free Cash Flow Yield | 7.95% | 2.21% | +5.74 | LULU | /fcf-yield <GO> |
| Operating Margin ACTIVE | 19.90% | 13.90% | +6.00 | LULU | /operating-margins <GO> |
| Net Profit Margin | 14.20% | 10.90% | +3.30 | LULU | /net-margins <GO> |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.90% | 14.30% | -9.40 | AS | /revenue-growth <GO> |
| Dividend Yield & FCF Payout Safety | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00 | TIE | /dividend-safety <GO> |
| Altman Z-Score & Debt/Equity | 5.25 | 3.74 | +1.51 | LULU | /balance-sheet <GO> |
| Piotroski F-Score Quality | 8/9 | 8/9 | 0.00 | TIE | /piotroski-score <GO> |
| Options Implied Move & Put/Call Skew | — | — | — | TIE | /options-implied-move <GO> |
| RSI-14 & 200D SMA Momentum | 57.1 | 55.2 | +1.90 | LULU | /rsi-technicals <GO> |
| 10Y Yield & FRED Macro Beta | 0.92 | 1.08 | -0.16 | AS | /macro-sensitivity <GO> |
| Forward P/E Multiple | 6.8x | 27.6x | -20.80 | LULU | /forward-pe <GO> |
| Enterprise Scale & Market Cap | $11.32B | $16.41B | -$5.09B | AS | /market-cap <GO> |
5-YEAR HISTORICAL XBRL REVENUE & MARGIN TRAJECTORY SEC FORM 10-K FY
| FISCAL YEAR | LULU REV | AS REV | LULU GROSS % | AS GROSS % | LULU FCF | AS FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2025 | $11.10B | — | 56.6% | — | $921.7M | — |
| FY 2024 | $10.59B | — | 59.2% | — | $1.58B | — |
| FY 2023 | $9.62B | — | — | — | $1.86B | — |
FRED MACRO REGIME CORRELATION COMPARISON PEARSON r
LULU // BETA 0.92
AS // BETA 1.08