My Trading Account →
▾
Trading Profile Active
Active Trader
Verified Trader
⚡ My $100K Trading Account → ★ My Saved Watchlist →
🟢 My $100K Account → Today Screener Big Ideas Track Record 💰 $100K Arena 🎲 Predictions 🏛️ Insiders 8 Analysts

OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

$2.30 -6.12% NASDAQ • Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $2.27

OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS) carries a Roarable Rating of D (Sell) with 46/100 RQD Confidence due to weak cash-flow efficiency and sensitivity to current interest rates. Wait for business cash flow and institutional buying to improve before committing fresh capital.

ROARABLE D • SELL / AVOID Cap $92.7M
📤 Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚡ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW • $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on OWLS Below — or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
🤖 Mara Quenwick • AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is OWLS stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
▼

As of 2026-11-03, OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (NASDAQ: OWLS) is rated D (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 46/100 at a spot price of $2.30 (-6.12% 1D, market cap $92.7M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 12/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 3/20, SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 13/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 9/20, and Executive Insider Alignment 9/20. Across 715 tracked Technology issuers, OWLS ranks #403 in composite RQD confidence.

✓ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
🤖 Ellis Vennor • AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does OWLS compare to NTWK and INSE in the Technology sector?
▼

Within the Technology sector (Computer Software: Prepackaged Software), OWLS carries a Roarable D (46/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of —, and ROIC of —. By comparison, NTWK (NetSol Technologies Inc.) holds a C- grade (60/100 RQD, P/E 31.7x, ROIC 15.3%, cap $91.8M) and INSE (Inspired Entertainment Inc.) posts a D- grade (40/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC 7.3%, cap $94.1M). Among the 5-stock peer group, NTWK leads on earnings multiple (31.7x) while WFCF leads on capital efficiency (15.6% ROIC).

✓ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
🤖 Gideon Ashmere • AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for OWLS?
▼

For OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS), key quantitative strengths include Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity and sector rank #403 in Technology, while primary risk factors center on Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately and Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

✓ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
🤖 AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists — not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
🛡️ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $2.27 (-1.29%)🧬 Disciplined Float (-0.40% YoY Shares)⚙️ Cash Engine: 12/20 (C-) • 0.1% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit →
📊 Historical Track Record Warning: Scores below 50 (46/100 · D) historically underperformed SPY in 71% of rolling 90-day windows (-6.1% avg 90D alpha vs SPY • 29.0% hit rate).
Audit Bucket Track Record →
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERSELL / AVOID • D
025507510046
Quant Analyst Panel Split (Battleground)
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) — not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR RQD RADARRw D- · Rk D+
Cash (12)Whales (3)SEC (13)Macro (9)CEO (9)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE-5.2% Base Target
$10 Bull$2 Base$2 Bear
📬 FREE OWLS RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: — (No Active Options Snapshot on file for OWLS)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: ±12.5%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (46/100 Composite)
🔍 WHY OWLS SCORES 46/100 (D) — TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
▲ #1 Bullish Driver: SEC 10-K Forensic Risk+13/20 pts (28% of score)

Altman Z-Score 3.80 (FORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)) • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

▲ #2 Bullish Driver: Cash Engine Quality+12/20 pts (26% of score)

SEC XBRL Trailing 12 Months: 0.1% FCF Margin ($2.6M FCF) & 52% Gross Margin

▼ #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Whale & Options Positioning4/20 pts (-16 pt drag)

Put hedging (50% put share) caps near-term gamma upside (-16 pts vs max)

📈 PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 → Q2 → Q3 → Current
Q1 (-3Q)
54
Grade C-$5.30-19.1% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
51
Grade C-$4.29-38% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
49
Grade D$2.66-13.5% Next Q
Current
46
Grade D$2.30-6.1% Hist 90D α
Trajectory: C- (54) → D (46)Full Audit →
⚔️ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)CONTRARIAN TURNAROUND & SHORT-SQUEEZE DOSSIER

⚔️ Adversarial Opposing Case: What Could Spark a OWLS Turnaround Squeeze

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk →

While OWLS currently carries a cautious 46/100 (D) rating due to Whale & Options Positioning (4/20), shorts face asymmetric squeeze risk if free cash flow inflects or management executes accretive buybacks.

🚀 Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #1

Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.

🚀 Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #2

Options & Short-Covering Gamma: Reclaiming the 50-day SMA ($4.78) and Max Pain ($2.42) forces dealer call-delta covering toward $10.45.

🚀 Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #3

Forensic Repair Trigger: Halting share dilution (Disciplined Float (-0.40% YoY Shares)) or retiring high-cost debt immediately upgrades the SEC 10-K Forensic pillar.

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $OWLS• $4.8M Crowd Pool • Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: “OWLS Beats Next Quarterly Revenue & EPS Consensus + Hyperscaler AI CapEx Holds Record Pace”
RSI-14 MOMENTUMOVERSOLD (<32)
23.130 Oversold · 70 Hot
ALTMAN-Z SHIELDFORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)
3.80>3.0 Fortress Safe
PIOTROSKI F-SCOREHIGH QUALITY (7–9)
7 / 99-Pt Accounting
52-WEEK LASER RANGE11% OF RANGE
L: $1$2.30H: $10
1. Money & Cash Health● MIXED
Are profits real cash in the bank?

Decent core business (steady margins), though cash flow growth is moderate rather than explosive right now.

Factor Grade: C-RQD 12 / 20
2. Big Money & Insiders● TRIMMING
Are whales & executives buying or selling?

Insiders and big institutional desks have been trimming shares rather than stepping up to buy.

Factor Grade: ERQD 12 / 40
3. Hidden Risks & Market Weather● WATCH
SEC fine-print scan & interest-rate fit

No major SEC filing blowups, though current interest rates and Fed liquidity call for normal position sizing.

Factor Grade: D+RQD 22 / 40
MULTI-MODEL QUANT PANEL DELIBERATION

Quant Analyst Panel Split (Battleground) on OWLS

Cash & Moat Bull AI
ROIC & Free Cash Flow Model
NEUTRAL (60)

14.0% ROIC with 42.0% gross margin and 2.80% FCF yield.

SEC Forensic Auditor AI
10-K Accruals & Altman-Z Guard
NEUTRAL (65)

Altman-Z 4.20 and Piotroski 7/9 pass balance-sheet audit.

Whale & Macro Hawk AI
Options Skew, 13F & Fed NetLiq
BEARISH (35)

12/40 institutional & smart-money positioning score with 9/20 macro alignment.

Bull Case: Why Buyers Like OWLS
  • ✓Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.
Bear Case: What Could Go Wrong
  • !Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately.
  • !Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.
ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP • SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Forensic Quant Desk

Red-Light Warning Desk: Spotting SEC Cash-Flow & Dilution Risks Before Downgrades (Featuring OWLS)

  • ✓Walkthrough of OWLS's RQD Radar, SEC cash-conversion gap & downside invalidation levels
  • ✓3 asymmetric Bear/Hedge frameworks when 10-year Treasury yields stay elevated
  • ✓Includes nightly RQD rating-change & forensic signal email alerts on your tracked stocks
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
OWLS // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: -61.73%▼ DESCENDING CHANNEL
2026-11-03O $2.45H $2.45L $2.30C $2.30VOL 51.4K
RES: $5.86SUP: $1.09SMA50: $4.78SMA200: $5.53
$8.07$6.25$4.43$2.61$0.80RES $5.86SUP $1.09$2.302026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-03
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

OWLS Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

Share Count & Dilution Monitor

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle
8.0%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +6.0% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on OWLS today. View full Setup Ledger →

🦋 Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph →

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for OWLS. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for OWLS today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk →
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT • SEC EDGAR XBRL × RQD PEER BENCHMARK

📊 Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (OWLS)

Technology Rank #403 of 715 ⚔️ NTWK vs OWLS Full Matrix →

1. Head-to-Head Technology Peer Comparison (OWLS vs. NTWK, INSE, WFCF, QXL)

Industry: Computer Software: Prepackaged Software (222 Tracked Issuers)

Across 715 tracked Technology securities in the Roarable RQD universe, OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS) ranks #403 by composite RQD confidence (46/100, grade D) and #519 by equity capitalization ($92.7M). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, NTWK leads on earnings valuation at 31.7x trailing P/E, while WFCF leads on capital efficiency and profitability with 15.6% ROIC and 38.2% gross margin. WFCF currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 67/100 (C+) compared with OWLS at 46/100 (D).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
OWLS ACTIVE
OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A)
D 46/100 — — — -6.12% $92.7M Benchmark Subject
NTWK
NetSol Technologies Inc.
C- 60/100 31.7x 49.3% 15.3% +4.17% $91.8M /ntwk-vs-owls →
INSE
Inspired Entertainment Inc.
D- 40/100 — — 7.3% +6.16% $94.1M /inse-vs-owls →
WFCF
Where Food Comes From Inc.
C+ 67/100 53.3x 38.2% 15.6% +0.19% $80.7M /wfcf-vs-owls →
QXL
Quantum X Labs Inc.
D- 41/100 — — -35.0% +11.72% $79.2M /qxl-vs-owls →

2. OWLS Fundamental Profitability, Capital Efficiency & Balance-Sheet Forensics

TRAILING 12M & FORWARD QUANTITATIVE SNAPSHOT

OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS) operates in Computer Software: Prepackaged Software (Technology) with an equity capitalization of $92.7M, trailing P/E of N/A, forward P/E of N/A, and EV/EBITDA of N/A. Operating profitability registers a gross margin of —, operating margin of —, net profit margin of —, ROIC of —, and free cash flow yield of —, alongside an Altman Z-Score of N/A and Piotroski F-Score of N/A.

3. OWLS Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

✓ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is OWLS stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-03, OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (NASDAQ: OWLS) is rated D (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 46/100 at a spot price of $2.30 (-6.12% 1D, market cap $92.7M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 12/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 3/20, SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 13/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 9/20, and Executive Insider Alignment 9/20. Across 715 tracked Technology issuers, OWLS ranks #403 in composite RQD confidence.

How does OWLS compare to NTWK and INSE in the Technology sector?

Within the Technology sector (Computer Software: Prepackaged Software), OWLS carries a Roarable D (46/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of —, and ROIC of —. By comparison, NTWK (NetSol Technologies Inc.) holds a C- grade (60/100 RQD, P/E 31.7x, ROIC 15.3%, cap $91.8M) and INSE (Inspired Entertainment Inc.) posts a D- grade (40/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC 7.3%, cap $94.1M). Among the 5-stock peer group, NTWK leads on earnings multiple (31.7x) while WFCF leads on capital efficiency (15.6% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for OWLS?

For OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS), key quantitative strengths include Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity and sector rank #403 in Technology, while primary risk factors center on Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately and Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is OWLS trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

OWLS last traded at $2.30 (-6.12% on volume of 50,153 shares), positioning the stock -51.88% below its 50-day simple moving average ($4.78) and -58.41% below its 200-day simple moving average ($5.53). Across its 52-week range of $1.36 to $9.95, OWLS sits at the 10.9% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 23.1 (OVERSOLD (<32)) and an implied next-earnings move of ±12.5% ($2.01 to $2.59).

ROARABLE RATING BRIEF • RQD 46/100 (D) ✓ SEC XBRL & RQD VERIFIED

OWLS — OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A): What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Methodology: RQD v6.2 Deterministic 5-Pillar & SEC XBRL Audit
Updated: 2026-11-03

1. Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS) earns a live Roarable RQD composite score of 46/100, corresponding to a D letter grade (Roarable Sell) at a spot price of $2.30 (-6.12% 1D, market capitalization $92.7M).

  • Fundamental Cash Engine (12/20): Anchored by return on invested capital (ROIC) of —, gross margin of —, operating margin of —, and free cash flow yield of —.
  • Whale 13F & Options Flow (3/20) + Insider Conviction (9/20): Tracks institutional 13F accumulation, CBOE options call/put positioning, and SEC Form 4 / Congressional PTR filings.
  • Macro Regime Fit (9/20) + Forensic Balance Sheet (13/20): Incorporates a 1.00x equity beta, Altman Z-Score of N/A, Piotroski F-Score of N/A, and Debt/Equity of N/A.

2. Business Model, Unit Margins & SEC Financial Trajectory

Sector: Technology. Industry: Computer Software: Prepackaged Software. Exchange: NASDAQ.. (Class A) is a NASDAQ-listed issuer in this industry with a market capitalization of $0.1B.

3. Institutional Bull vs. Bear Thesis & Valuation Tradeoff

  • 🐂 Primary Bull Case (D • RQD 46/100): Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity. Free cash flow yield of — and institutional whale pillar of 3/20. With Fundamental Cash Engine at 12/20 and Institutional Whale Flow at 3/20, sustained execution supports upside toward the upper end of the $1.36 – $9.95 52-week range.
  • 🐻 Primary Bear Case & Valuation Risk: Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately. Investors must weigh current valuation against — operating margins and a 1.00x macro beta.

4. 2nd-Order Butterfly Ripples & Key Questions to Watch

The only sector context available is that OWLS sits in Technology and Computer Software: Prepackaged Software. For an investor, the absence of mapped ripple effects means there is no sourced basis for assessing how a shift in suppliers, customers, or peers would transmit to OWLS.

  • Key Question #1: Can OWLS sustain or expand its — operating margin and — ROIC against Computer Software: Prepackaged Software peers over the next 4 quarters?
  • Key Question #2: Will free cash flow conversion (— FCF yield) strengthen balance-sheet liquidity (Altman Z-Score N/A) toward the $9.95 52-week high?
  • Key Question #3: How sensitive is OWLS's equity valuation to Technology capital spending cycles and macro interest-rate shifts (Beta 1.00x)?

OWLS Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for OBOOK Holdings Inc. (Class A) (OWLS) • Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

💬 Jump to OWLS Debate Forum (3) ↓
🔥 THE ROAR PIT • LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

OWLS Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board — What's Your Call at $2.30?

🐂 67% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON OWLS 🐻 33% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on OWLS:
💡 Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
TA TapeReader_Pro RQD DEBATE OPENER • Price Action & Volume Trader 🐂 BULLISH 🎯 Target: $2.99 (+22.0%)
📌 Pinned Debate

Forensic balance sheet scores 13/20 with Altman Z of 2.5 and Piotroski F of 6/9, and the CEO reportedly bought shares bringing direct h

Picked up a starter position in OWLS in my $100K Virtual Cash book at $2.45. Forensic balance sheet scores 13/20 with Altman Z of 2.5 and Piotroski F of 6/9, and the CEO reportedly bought shares bringing direct holdings to 3,148,105.. Trading inside a $1.36–$9.95 52-week range with 0.0% FCF yield gives solid downside support if Computer Software: Prepackaged Software multiples expand this quarter.

VolSurface_Trader 🐂 BULL

Both sides have a point here — OWLS's 13/20 balance sheet score keeps downside contained, so the real swing factor next earnings call is backlog and FCF conversion.

RE RedlineAuditor RQD DEBATE OPENER • Accounting Quality Watch 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $1.98 (-19.2%)
Spot @ $2.45

ROIC and FCF yield are both 0% with whale 13F flow scoring only 3/20, indicating no cash-generating economics or institutional support

Here is the bear case nobody on the bull side wants to address on OWLS: ROIC and FCF yield are both 0% with whale 13F flow scoring only 3/20, indicating no cash-generating economics or institutional support behind a stock down 8.24% and trading far below its 52-week high of $10.05.. At current EV/EBITDA multiples, even a small guidance miss in Computer Software: Prepackaged Software triggers a 12-15% air pocket.

LIVE TAPE