Autoliv Inc. (ALV) Revenue-to-Profit Sankey Flow & SEC XBRL Financials

Per the Roarable RQD rating, ALV scores 69 out of 100, a C+ grade, with the verdict "Roarable Hold — Upper Neutral / Watch for Breakout." The five pillars break down as follows:

• Fundamental cash engine: 18 / 20. This is the strongest pillar. Per the RQD rating, ROIC is 23.2% and FCF yield is 8.5%. For an investor, this indicates the business converts capital into returns and cash at a high rate relative to the market price, which is the primary source of upside if that conversion persists.
• Insider conviction: 18 / 20. Per the RQD rating, this reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. The source does not provide the underlying trade details, so the score should be read as a summary signal only.
• Forensic balance sheet: 16 / 20. Per the RQD rating, Altman Z is 3.28, Piotroski F is 8/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.67. These point to a financially sound balance sheet with low distress risk, reducing downside from solvency concerns.
• Whale / 13F flow: 10 / 20. Per the RQD rating, institutional accumulation and options positioning are only moderately supportive. Institutional conviction is not a clear tailwind.
• Macro regime fit: 7 / 20. Per the RQD rating, beta is 1.11 and sector sensitivity is elevated. This is the weakest pillar: the stock is likely to amplify broader market moves, which is a valuation and volatility tradeoff for an investor.

Net implication: the cash generation and balance sheet support the rating, while weak macro fit and modest institutional flow cap the score and explain the "Hold / Watch for Breakout" framing. Upside depends on the cash engine sustaining itself through a sector-sensitive environment; valuation (P/E TTM 11.5, forward P/E 10.7) is modest relative to these metrics, but the source does not establish a fair-value conclusion.

Per the SEC financials, revenue rose from $10475.0M (FY 2023) to $10815.0M (FY 2025), and net income rose from $488.0M to $735.0M over the same span. Per the market data, gross margin is 19.2%, operating margin 10.1%, and net margin 6.8%. Per the RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 3.28 and the Piotroski F-Score is 8/9. Debt declined from $2941.4M (FY 2023) to $1734.0M (FY 2025), and cash rose to $604.0M, consistent with the Debt/Equity of 0.67 cited in the RQD rating.

The news wire contains six Yahoo Finance headlines, all relating to ALV:

• RISK WATCH (RED): "Autoliv (ALV) Stock Price Drops After Q3 Earnings Margin Squeeze" and "Autoliv (ALV) Could Be 18% Below Fair Value Following Q3 Miss and Guidance Cut." These cite a Q3 margin squeeze, a Q3 miss, and a guidance cut. The source provides no further detail on these events.
• MARKET WIRE (YELLOW): "Autoliv Stock After Q3 Earnings: Buy, Hold or Sell the Stock?", "Autoliv (ALV) Stock May Be 48% Undervalued As Cash Flow Leads The Case", "Autoliv (ALV) Could Be 18% Undervalued As Efficiency Plans Support Margins", and "Why Autoliv (ALV) shares are trading lower today." These reference efficiency plans supporting margins and cash flow as a bull case, alongside lower trading.

Net read: the news flow is mixed, with two RED risk-watch items tied to Q3 margin and guidance pressure offset by YELLOW items highlighting cash flow and efficiency. Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, no supply-chain links or proprietary signals are present (see next section).

• What are the specific drivers behind the Q3 margin squeeze and guidance cut referenced in the news wire, and what is the size of the guidance change?
• What is the composition of revenue and customer concentration, and how dependent is the business on specific OEM programs?
• What are the identities and sizes of the insider Form 4 trades and Congressional PTRs underlying the insider conviction pillar?
• What is the reported EPS for FY 2025, FY 2024, and FY 2023, given that the source lists these as N/A?
• Does the FY 2023 cash figure and the missing forward-looking consensus estimate change the cash-engine assessment?