Change Agents Corporation (CHGA) Dividend Safety Gauge & 10-Year DRIP Compounder

Per the Roarable RQD rating, CHGA holds an RQD Score of 35 out of 100, graded D-, with the verdict label "Roarable Sell — Vulnerable Balance Sheet & Flow." Across the five pillars: Fundamental Cash Engine scores 8 of 20 (ROIC -35%; FCF yield 0%); Whale 13F Flow scores 3 of 20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning); Insider Conviction scores 5 of 20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow); Macro Regime Fit scores 9 of 20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity); and Forensic Balance Sheet scores 10 of 20 (Altman Z 2.5; Piotroski F 1/9; Debt/Equity 0.5). Every pillar sits below its midpoint. For a prospective investor, the weakest signals are cash generation and institutional or insider flow, which together indicate the company is not currently self-funding and is not drawing meaningful sponsorship in the source data. The Altman Z and Debt/Equity readings are the relatively steadier parts of the picture, but a Piotroski F of 1/9 signals weak fundamental quality. Any upside case would depend on a reversal in cash burn that the source data does not show.

Per the SEC financials, the company reported operating and net losses across all three listed periods, with revenue falling to $0.0M in FY 2025 from $1.3M in FY 2024. Market data lists gross, operating, and net margins each at 0% and ROIC at -35%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.5 and the Piotroski F-Score is 1/9, with Debt/Equity at 0.5. Cash fell to $0.1M in FY 2025 from $2.7M in FY 2024.

Per the recent news wire, five items are tagged to CHGA, each with a YELLOW light and MARKET WIRE impact label:

• A TradingView report titled "Change Agents Corporation Estimates – NASDAQ:CHGA" covering market action and positioning.
• An Investing.com report on shareholders approving multiple stock proposals at a special meeting.
• A Benzinga piece grouping CHGA among four stocks building in AI agents, alongside META, CRM, and NOW.
• A Stock Titan report stating all 17 proposals passed, including an expansion of the stock incentive plan.
• A Stock Titan report on Meta's AI assistant potentially connecting users to Catch-Up and Beacon.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is listed as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. Risk watch items drawn from the RQD rating are the negative ROIC, zero FCF yield, and the 52-week range from $1.27 to $42.8 against a current price of 1.46.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, there are no upstream or downstream dependencies, no sector correlation links, and no second-order bottleneck links recorded. The graph lists sector as Technology and industry as EDP Services, but no connected entities. Investors should note the absence of mapped ripples is a data limitation, not evidence of independence.

• What is the company's actual revenue model and customer base, given that the source data reports $0.0M revenue for FY 2025?
• What are the current P/E, EPS, and EV/EBITDA figures, given that these fields are unavailable in the source data?
• What is the basis for the 52-week price range spanning $1.27 to $42.8, and what drove the decline?
• Does the company have sufficient cash to fund operations beyond the $0.1M reported for FY 2025?
• What is the outcome of the shareholder-approved stock incentive plan expansion for dilution and capital structure?