Fortive Corporation (FTV) Revenue-to-Profit Sankey Flow & SEC XBRL Financials

$65.23 -0.93% NYSE β€’ Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $65.00

Fortive Corporation (FTV) carries a Roarable Rating of C+ (Hold) with 67/100 RQD Confidence. The composite score sits in the neutral Hold band (59–69), meaning current holders don’t need to panic-sell while prospective buyers can wait for a move into the 70+ Buy zone.

ROARABLE C+ β€’ HOLD / WATCH Cap $19.60B
πŸ“€ Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚑ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW β€’ $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on FTV Below β€” or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
πŸ€– Mara Quenwick β€’ AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is FTV stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
β–Ό

As of 2026-11-02, Fortive Corporation (NYSE: FTV) is rated C+ (Hold / HOLD) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 67/100 at a spot price of $65.23 (-0.93% 1D, market cap $19.60B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 13/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 16/20, Executive Insider Alignment 14/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 11/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 13/20. Across 485 tracked Industrials issuers, FTV ranks #69 in composite RQD confidence.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Ellis Vennor β€’ AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does FTV compare to NDSN and ZBRA in the Industrials sector?
β–Ό

Within the Industrials sector (Industrial Machinery/Components), FTV carries a Roarable C+ (67/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 36.8x, gross margin of 63.5%, and ROIC of 6.8%. By comparison, NDSN (Nordson Corporation) holds a B+ grade (77/100 RQD, P/E 37.8x, ROIC 11.4%, cap $18.33B) and ZBRA (Zebra Technologies Corporation) posts a C+ grade (68/100 RQD, P/E 42.6x, ROIC 9.5%, cap $17.85B). Among the 5-stock peer group, NVT leads on earnings multiple (31.5x) while NDSN leads on capital efficiency (11.4% ROIC).

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Gideon Ashmere β€’ AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for FTV?
β–Ό

Per FTV's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001659166), Fortive Corporation generated $4.16B in revenue (+1.9% YoY), $532.7M in net income, and $978.1M in free cash flow against $11.74B in total assets and $2.31B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Big institutional funds and options desks are actively positioning on the bullish side.. Primary risk factors monitored: Broader market pullbacks can still drag down strong stocks in the short run.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists β€” not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
πŸ›‘οΈ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $65.00 (-0.36%)🧬 Cannibal Buyback (-1.52% YoY Shares)βš™οΈ Cash Engine: 13/20 (C) β€’ 23.5% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit β†’
πŸ“Š Historical Track Record: Scores of 67/100 (C+) historically posted market-perform odds over rolling 90-day windows (+1.6% avg 90D alpha vs SPY β€’ 56.4% hit rate β€” wait for RQD β‰₯ 70 breakout).
Audit Bucket Track Record β†’
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERHOLD / WATCH β€’ C+
025507510067
2-of-3 JEV AI Jury Bullish
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) β€” not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR SNOWFLAKE RADARRw B- Β· Rk C
Cash (13)Whales (16)SEC (14)Macro (11)CEO (13)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE+4% Base Target
$80 Bull$68 Base$53 Bear
πŸ“¬ FREE FTV RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: β€” (No Active Options Snapshot on file for FTV)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: Β±5.4%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (67/100 Composite)
πŸ” WHY FTV SCORES 67/100 (C+) β€” TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
β–² #1 Bullish Driver: Whale & Options Positioning+16/20 pts (24% of score)

20D Institutional Volume Accumulation (Β±5.4% realized swing band)

β–² #2 Bullish Driver: SEC 10-K Forensic Risk+14/20 pts (21% of score)

Altman Z-Score 3.23 (FORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)) β€’ Piotroski F-Score 6/9

β–Ό #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Macro Regime Fit11/20 pts (-9 pt drag)

Macro rate sensitivity & RSI-14 (78.5) create a -9 pt regime headwind

πŸ“ˆ PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 β†’ Q2 β†’ Q3 β†’ Current
Q1 (-3Q)
59
Grade C$58.07+0.5% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
62
Grade C+$58.36+5.6% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
64
Grade C+$61.62+5.9% Next Q
Current
67
Grade C+$65.23+1.6% Hist 90D Ξ±
Trajectory: C (59) β†’ C+ (67)Full Audit β†’
βš”οΈ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)GIDEON ASHMERE // FORENSIC SHORT & KILL-SWITCH DOSSIER

βš”οΈ Adversarial Opposing Case: Why the FTV Bull Thesis Could Fail

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk β†’

Even with a 67/100 (C+) score, FTV faces multiple-compression risk if 36.8x trailing P/E re-rate toward historical sector medians or if hyperscaler/enterprise customer concentration slows in upcoming 10-Q filings.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #1

Broader market pullbacks can still drag down strong stocks in the short run.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #2

Dilution & Margin Drag: Cannibal Buyback (-1.52% YoY Shares) β€” any gross margin slip below 61.0% triggers an automatic RQD downgrade.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #3

Technical & Forensic Kill-Switch: A daily close below the 50D SMA ($58.01) or 200D SMA ($58.80) invalidates the momentum regime and cuts Target Base ($67.87) toward Bear Floor ($52.94).

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $FTVβ€’ $2.4M Crowd Pool β€’ Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: β€œFTV Beats Next Quarter EPS Consensus (Dec 30, 2026) & Holds Above 200D SMA”
VISUAL REVENUE-TO-PROFIT SANKEY WATERFALL β€’ FY 2025 (10-K)

How FTV Turns Every Dollar of Sales Into Real Bottom-Line Profit

Free Cash Flow:$978.1M (23.5% FCF Margin)
Revenue$4.16BGross Profit $2.64B (63.5%)Cost of Sales $1.52BOp Profit $720.2M (17.3%)OpEx (R&D/SG&A) $1.92BNet Profit$532.7M (12.8%)Tax/Other $187.5M

Multi-Year SEC EDGAR XBRL Revenue, Net Profit & Free Cash Flow Trajectory

β–  Revenueβ–  Net Profitβ–  Free Cash Flow
FY23
Rev $3.91B
FY24
Rev $4.08B
FY25
Rev $4.16B
Fiscal YearRevenueGross MarginOp MarginNet ProfitFree Cash FlowROIC %
FY 2025$4.16B63.5%17.3%$532.7M$978.1M6.8%
FY 2024$4.08B64.2%17.6%$832.9M$1.44B4.5%
FY 2023$3.91B63.5%14.7%$865.8M$1.18B7%
ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP β€’ SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Forensic Quant Desk

Red-Light Warning Desk: Spotting SEC Cash-Flow & Dilution Risks Before Downgrades (Featuring FTV)

  • βœ“Walkthrough of FTV's RQD Radar, SEC cash-conversion gap & downside invalidation levels
  • βœ“3 asymmetric Bear/Hedge frameworks when 10-year Treasury yields stay elevated
  • βœ“Includes nightly RQD rating-change & forensic signal email alerts on your tracked stocks
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
FTV // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: +8.57%πŸ“ HORIZONTAL RANGE
2026-11-02O $64.11H $65.84L $64.11C $65.23VOL 3.77M
RES: $67.10SUP: $52.53SMA50: $58.01SMA200: $58.80
$68.00$63.99$59.97$55.96$51.94RES $67.10SUP $52.53$65.232026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-02
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

FTV Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

Share Count & Dilution Monitor (#25)

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle (#30)
28.3%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +1.9% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger (#33)

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on FTV today. View full Setup Ledger β†’

πŸ¦‹ Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph β†’

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for FTV. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for FTV today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk β†’
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT β€’ SEC EDGAR XBRL Γ— RQD PEER BENCHMARK

πŸ“Š Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (FTV)

1. Head-to-Head Industrials Peer Comparison (FTV vs. NDSN, ZBRA, NVT, SYM)

Industry: Industrial Machinery/Components (208 Tracked Issuers)

Across 485 tracked Industrials securities in the Roarable RQD universe, Fortive Corporation (FTV) ranks #69 by composite RQD confidence (67/100, grade C+) and #62 by equity capitalization ($19.60B). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, NVT leads on earnings valuation at 31.5x trailing P/E, while NDSN leads on capital efficiency and profitability with 11.4% ROIC and 55.2% gross margin. NDSN currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 77/100 (B+) compared with FTV at 67/100 (C+).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
FTV ACTIVE
Fortive Corporation
C+ 67/100 36.8x 63.5% 6.8% -0.93% $19.60B Benchmark Subject
NDSN
Nordson Corporation
B+ 77/100 37.8x 55.2% 11.4% -1.95% $18.33B /ndsn-vs-ftv β†’
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
C+ 68/100 42.6x 48.1% 9.5% -4.27% $17.85B /zbra-vs-ftv β†’
NVT
nVent Electric plc
D+ 56/100 31.5x 37.7% 10.9% -8.81% $22.36B /nvt-vs-ftv β†’
SYM
Symbotic Inc.
D 47/100 β€” 18.8% -5.0% +1.42% $22.62B /sym-vs-ftv β†’

2. Multi-Year SEC XBRL Revenue, Cash Flow & Balance-Sheet Trajectory (FY2023–FY2025)

SEC EDGAR 10-K β€’ FILED 2025-12-31 β€’ CIK 0001659166

In its most recent audited fiscal period (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31), Fortive Corporation (FTV) reported GAAP revenue of $4.16B (+1.9% vs. FY2024 revenue of $4.08B , and +6.3% cumulative change since FY2023) , GAAP net income of $532.7M, operating cash flow of $1.08B, and free cash flow of $978.1M (-32.1% YoY). On the balance sheet, FTV closed FY2025 with $11.74B in total assets against $2.31B in total debt (Altman Z-Score: 3.23, Piotroski F-Score: 6/9).

Fiscal Period Filing Date Revenue Net Income Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Total Assets Total Debt
FY2025 (FY) 2025-12-31 $4.16B $532.7M $1.08B $978.1M $11.74B $2.31B
FY2024 (FY) 2024-12-31 $4.08B $832.9M $1.53B $1.44B $17.02B $3.33B
FY2023 (FY) 2023-12-31 $3.91B $865.8M $1.35B $1.18B $10.78B $2.52B

3. FTV Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

βœ“ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is FTV stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-02, Fortive Corporation (NYSE: FTV) is rated C+ (Hold / HOLD) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 67/100 at a spot price of $65.23 (-0.93% 1D, market cap $19.60B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 13/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 16/20, Executive Insider Alignment 14/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 11/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 13/20. Across 485 tracked Industrials issuers, FTV ranks #69 in composite RQD confidence.

How does FTV compare to NDSN and ZBRA in the Industrials sector?

Within the Industrials sector (Industrial Machinery/Components), FTV carries a Roarable C+ (67/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 36.8x, gross margin of 63.5%, and ROIC of 6.8%. By comparison, NDSN (Nordson Corporation) holds a B+ grade (77/100 RQD, P/E 37.8x, ROIC 11.4%, cap $18.33B) and ZBRA (Zebra Technologies Corporation) posts a C+ grade (68/100 RQD, P/E 42.6x, ROIC 9.5%, cap $17.85B). Among the 5-stock peer group, NVT leads on earnings multiple (31.5x) while NDSN leads on capital efficiency (11.4% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for FTV?

Per FTV's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001659166), Fortive Corporation generated $4.16B in revenue (+1.9% YoY), $532.7M in net income, and $978.1M in free cash flow against $11.74B in total assets and $2.31B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Big institutional funds and options desks are actively positioning on the bullish side.. Primary risk factors monitored: Broader market pullbacks can still drag down strong stocks in the short run.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is FTV trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

FTV last traded at $65.23 (-0.93% on volume of 4,904,069 shares), positioning the stock +12.45% above its 50-day simple moving average ($58.01) and +10.94% above its 200-day simple moving average ($58.80). Across its 52-week range of $49.03 to $67.03, FTV sits at the 90.0% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 78.5 (OVERBOUGHT (>70)) and an implied next-earnings move of Β±5.4% ($61.71 to $68.75).

FTV Investor FAQ & Complete 8-Part Research Index

100% OPEN ACCESS β€’ SEC EDGAR Γ— CBOE Γ— FRED

How profitable is Fortive Corporation (FTV)?

In FY 2025 (10-K), FTV converted $4.2B of revenue into a 63.5% gross margin, 17.3% operating margin, and $978.1M in free cash flow (23.5% FCF margin).

ROARABLE RATING BRIEF β€’ RQD 67/100 (C+) βœ“ STAGE-C NUMBER FIREWALL VERIFIED

FTV β€” Fortive Corporation: What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Engine: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
As of: 2026-11-02T15:13:45Z

Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

Per the Roarable RQD rating, FTV scores 67 out of 100 (letter grade C+; verdict "Roarable Hold β€” Upper Neutral / Watch for Breakout"). The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine 13/20 (ROIC 6.8%; FCF yield 4.99%); Whale 13F Flow 16/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning); Insider Conviction 13/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow); Macro Regime Fit 11/20 (Beta 0.98; sector sensitivity); and Forensic Balance Sheet 14/20 (Altman Z 3.23; Piotroski F 6/9; Debt/Equity 0.36).

Investor implications: the strongest pillar is institutional positioning, which is the main upside driver flagged by the rating. The weakest pillar is macro regime fit, where a beta near 1.0 means the stock is expected to move roughly in line with the market rather than offering a defensive or asymmetric profile. The cash engine score is moderate: a 6.8% ROIC and 4.99% FCF yield are the figures the rating uses, and they do not by themselves signal exceptional capital efficiency. The forensic balance sheet score is solid, supported by a Z-Score in the source's benchmark range and a 0.36 Debt/Equity. Valuation is a tradeoff: per the Snapshot, P/E (TTM) is 36.8 and EV/EBITDA is 26.6, which are elevated relative to the rating's cash-yield measures, so upside depends on sustained earnings growth. The verdict is a hold-with-watch posture, not a directional call.

Snapshot

PriceMarket CapP/E (TTM)Forward P/EEV/EBITDAEPS (TTM)Dividend YieldBeta52-Wk RangeROIC %
65.84$19.6B36.834.226.61.790.47%0.98$49.03 - $67.036.8%

Business

Sector: Industrials. Industry: Industrial Machinery/Components. Exchange: NYSE. Per the profile, Fortive Corporation is a NYSE-listed Industrials issuer in Industrial Machinery/Components. Not available in source data: the specific products sold, customer base, and revenue model.

Financial Trend

PeriodRevenueOperating IncomeNet IncomeEPSFCFCashDebt
FY 2025$4159.1M$720.2M$532.7MN/A$978.1M$375.5M$2306.5M
FY 2024$4080.9M$716.3M$832.9MN/A$1440.7M$813.3M$3331.1M
FY 2023$3913.9M$574.0M$865.8MN/A$1177.5MN/A$2522.1M

Per the SEC financials, revenue rose from $3913.9M (FY 2023) to $4159.1M (FY 2025), while net income declined from $865.8M to $532.7M over the same span. Per the market data, gross margin is 63.5%, operating margin 17.3%, and net margin 12.8%; ROIC is 6.8%. The rating cites an Altman Z-Score of 3.23 and Piotroski F-Score of 6/9. Debt fell from $3331.1M (FY 2024) to $2306.5M (FY 2025), and Debt/Equity is 0.36 per the rating.

Recent Catalysts & News Wire Analysis

Per the news feed, all six items are tagged YELLOW and "MARKET WIRE." Headlines reference the Q3 report: one item states Fortive "Posts Q3 Adjusted EPS $0.77 per Share, vs. FactSet Est of $0.70," indicating an earnings beat against that estimate. A second item covers an upcoming Q3 earnings report. Other items cover a "Hold" rating and an "overvalued" commentary, which are noted as risk-watch items. The Butterfly supply-chain graph reports no supply-chain links and no proprietary signals.

Open Questions

  • What is the company's specific product and end-market mix, and how much of revenue is cyclical versus recurring?
  • Why did net income decline from $865.8M (FY 2023) to $532.7M (FY 2025) while revenue grew, and is the trend driven by one-time items or structural margin pressure?
  • What were the actual Q3 results and guidance behind the news-feed EPS headlines, and how do they reconcile with the reported annual figures?
  • What are the analyst consensus rating and price targets, and which institutions hold the 13F positions cited in the rating?
  • What drove the change in cash from $813.3M (FY 2024) to $375.5M (FY 2025) alongside debt reduction, and what is the capital allocation plan?

FTV Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for Fortive Corporation (FTV) β€’ Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

πŸ’¬ Jump to FTV Debate Forum (3) ↓
πŸ”₯ THE ROAR PIT β€’ LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

FTV Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board β€” What's Your Call at $65.23?

πŸ‚ 50% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON FTV 🐻 50% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on FTV:
πŸ’‘ Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
RO RoarDesk_Moderator Roarable Research Desk βš–οΈ DEBATE HOST 🎯 Target: $71.11 (+8.0%)
πŸ“Œ Pinned Debate

πŸ”₯ Official Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is FTV (C+ β€’ RQD 67/100) a Buy at $65.84?

Welcome to the FTV (Fortive Corporation) Roar Pit. Current RQD Composite is 67/100 (Roarable Hold β€” Upper Neutral / Watch for Breakout) in Industrial Machinery/Components. Bulls point to operating leverage and sector positioning, while bears focus on valuation multiple compression (36.8x trailing P/E). Pick your side (πŸ‚ Bull or 🐻 Bear) and drop your price target below.

RE RedlineAuditor Forensic Accounting Watch 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $54.65 (-17.0%)
Spot @ $65.84

Pump the brakes on FTV β€” check the valuation vs. margin headwinds

Everyone in here is repeating the bull case on FTV, but look at what you are paying: 36.8x trailing P/E with 63.5% gross margins. Unless Fortive Corporation expands free cash flow yield next quarter, I would rather wait for a pullback closer to the 200-day moving average before touching this.

TA TapeReader_Pro Verified K Arena Trader πŸ‚ BULLISH 🎯 Target: $82.30 (+25.0%)
Spot @ $65.84

FTV cash flow & RQD setup is being underpriced by the Street here

Looking at the 5-pillar RQD breakdown on FTV, the market is fixating on short-term headline noise in Industrial Machinery/Components and ignoring the balance sheet and cash flow trajectory. At $65.84 (52-wk range $49.03 - $67.03), any beat on forward guidance forces shorts and underweight funds to chase.

LIVE TAPE SPY $755.72 -0.38% QQQ $690.49 -1.44% DIA $517.13 -0.37% IWM $279.33 +0.96% NVDA $204.64 -4.22% AAPL $344.63 -1.23% MSFT $521.91 -1.55% TSLA $399.81 -0.86% PLTR $184.11 -6.27% SOFI $16.76 -4.83% IBIT $43.36 -0.94% GLD $355.78 -1.34%