ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (GTM) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

$4.31 -1.15% NASDAQ β€’ Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $4.29

ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (GTM) carries a Roarable Rating of D+ (Sell) with 52/100 RQD Confidence due to weak cash-flow efficiency and sensitivity to current interest rates. Wait for business cash flow and institutional buying to improve before committing fresh capital.

ROARABLE D+ β€’ SELL / AVOID Cap $1.27B
πŸ“€ Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚑ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW β€’ $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on GTM Below β€” or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
πŸ€– Mara Quenwick β€’ AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is GTM stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
β–Ό

As of 2026-11-03, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: GTM) is rated D+ (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 52/100 at a spot price of $4.31 (-1.15% 1D, market cap $1.27B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 11/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 9/20, Executive Insider Alignment 12/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 13/20. Across 714 tracked Technology issuers, GTM ranks #319 in composite RQD confidence.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Ellis Vennor β€’ AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does GTM compare to RDVT and BBAI in the Technology sector?
β–Ό

Within the Technology sector (Computer Software: Prepackaged Software), GTM carries a Roarable D+ (52/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 10.5x, gross margin of 84.0%, and ROIC of 6.7%. By comparison, RDVT (Red Violet Inc.) holds a C+ grade (68/100 RQD, P/E 98.2x, ROIC 16.1%, cap $1.28B) and BBAI (BigBear.ai Inc.) posts a E grade (28/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -27.5%, cap $1.25B). Among the 5-stock peer group, PD leads on earnings multiple (7.9x) while RDVT leads on capital efficiency (16.1% ROIC).

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Gideon Ashmere β€’ AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for GTM?
β–Ό

Per GTM's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001794515), ZoomInfo Technologies Inc generated $1.25B in revenue (+2.9% YoY), $124.2M in net income, and $465.4M in free cash flow against $6.44B in total assets and $1.32B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.. Primary risk factors monitored: Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists β€” not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
πŸ›‘οΈ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $4.29 (-0.40%)🧬 Cannibal Buyback (-1.52% YoY Shares)βš™οΈ Cash Engine: 11/20 (D+) β€’ 37.2% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit β†’
πŸ“Š Historical Track Record: Scores of 52/100 (D+) historically posted market-perform odds over rolling 90-day windows (-1.1% avg 90D alpha vs SPY β€’ 50.1% hit rate β€” wait for RQD β‰₯ 70 breakout).
Audit Bucket Track Record β†’
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERSELL / AVOID β€’ D+
025507510052
JEV AI Jury Split (Battleground)
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) β€” not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR SNOWFLAKE RADARRw D+ Β· Rk D
Cash (11)Whales (9)SEC (12)Macro (7)CEO (13)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE-2.8% Base Target
$13 Bull$4 Base$3 Bear
πŸ“¬ FREE GTM RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: β€” (No Active Options Snapshot on file for GTM)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: Β±10.8%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (52/100 Composite)
πŸ” WHY GTM SCORES 52/100 (D+) β€” TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
β–² #1 Bullish Driver: Insider Conviction & Share Dilution+13/20 pts (25% of score)

SEC Form 4 / 13F Thermometer: 65% Net Buy β€’ Cannibal Buyback (-1.52% YoY Shares)

β–² #2 Bullish Driver: SEC 10-K Forensic Risk+12/20 pts (23% of score)

Altman Z-Score 0.53 (DISTRESS RISK (<1.8)) β€’ Piotroski F-Score 7/9

β–Ό #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Macro Regime Fit7/20 pts (-13 pt drag)

Macro rate sensitivity & RSI-14 (58.6) create a -13 pt regime headwind

πŸ“ˆ PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 β†’ Q2 β†’ Q3 β†’ Current
Q1 (-3Q)
44
Grade D$3.94+4.1% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
47
Grade D$4.10+6.1% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
49
Grade D$4.35-0.9% Next Q
Current
52
Grade D+$4.31-1.1% Hist 90D Ξ±
Trajectory: D (44) β†’ D+ (52)Full Audit β†’
βš”οΈ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)CONTRARIAN TURNAROUND & SHORT-SQUEEZE DOSSIER

βš”οΈ Adversarial Opposing Case: What Could Spark a GTM Turnaround Squeeze

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk β†’

While GTM currently carries a cautious 52/100 (D+) rating due to Macro Regime Fit (7/20), shorts face asymmetric squeeze risk if free cash flow inflects or management executes accretive buybacks.

πŸš€ Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #1

Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.

πŸš€ Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #2

Options & Short-Covering Gamma: Reclaiming the 50-day SMA ($4.00) and Max Pain ($4.53) forces dealer call-delta covering toward $12.93.

πŸš€ Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #3

Forensic Repair Trigger: Halting share dilution (Cannibal Buyback (-1.52% YoY Shares)) or retiring high-cost debt immediately upgrades the SEC 10-K Forensic pillar.

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $GTMβ€’ $4.8M Crowd Pool β€’ Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: β€œGTM Beats Next Quarterly Revenue & EPS Consensus + Hyperscaler AI CapEx Holds Record Pace”
SEC FORM 4 Γ— 13F HEDGE FUNDS Γ— CONGRESSIONAL STOCK ACT

GTM Smart-Money Thermometer: HEAVY INSIDER & 13F ACCUMULATION

Explore All 13F & Congress Whales β†’
β–² Disclosed Buys: 0 ($0)β–Ό Disclosed Sales: 0 ($0)

Wide-Open SEC Form 4, 13F & Congressional Disclosure Ledger (GTM)

No recent open-market Form 4 cluster sales or emergency dumps flagged on GTM. Visit the Global 13F & Congressional Whale Ledger for cross-market smart-money filings.

ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP β€’ SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Forensic Quant Desk

Red-Light Warning Desk: Spotting SEC Cash-Flow & Dilution Risks Before Downgrades (Featuring GTM)

  • βœ“Walkthrough of GTM's RQD Radar, SEC cash-conversion gap & downside invalidation levels
  • βœ“3 asymmetric Bear/Hedge frameworks when 10-year Treasury yields stay elevated
  • βœ“Includes nightly RQD rating-change & forensic signal email alerts on your tracked stocks
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
GTM // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: -33.90%⚑ TESTING RESISTANCE
2026-11-03O $4.48H $4.48L $4.31C $4.31VOL 4.06M
RES: $4.51SUP: $3.93SMA50: $4.00SMA200: $4.73
$9.50$7.61$5.73$3.84$1.96RES $4.51SUP $3.93$4.312026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-03
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

GTM Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

Share Count & Dilution Monitor (#25)

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle (#30)
-0.2%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +2.9% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger (#33)

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on GTM today. View full Setup Ledger β†’

πŸ¦‹ Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph β†’

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for GTM. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for GTM today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk β†’
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT β€’ SEC EDGAR XBRL Γ— RQD PEER BENCHMARK

πŸ“Š Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (GTM)

1. Head-to-Head Technology Peer Comparison (GTM vs. RDVT, BBAI, ALKT, PD)

Industry: Computer Software: Prepackaged Software (222 Tracked Issuers)

Across 714 tracked Technology securities in the Roarable RQD universe, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (GTM) ranks #319 by composite RQD confidence (52/100, grade D+) and #334 by equity capitalization ($1.27B). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, PD leads on earnings valuation at 7.9x trailing P/E, while RDVT leads on capital efficiency and profitability with 16.1% ROIC and β€” gross margin. RDVT currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 68/100 (C+) compared with GTM at 52/100 (D+).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
GTM ACTIVE
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc
D+ 52/100 10.5x 84.0% 6.7% -1.15% $1.27B Benchmark Subject
RDVT
Red Violet Inc.
C+ 68/100 98.2x β€” 16.1% -2.84% $1.28B /rdvt-vs-gtm β†’
BBAI
BigBear.ai Inc.
E 28/100 β€” 22.3% -27.5% -0.77% $1.25B /bbai-vs-gtm β†’
ALKT
Alkami Technology Inc.
E 31/100 β€” 57.8% -14.2% +7.58% $1.33B /alkt-vs-gtm β†’
PD
PagerDuty Inc.
C 63/100 7.9x 84.9% 6.8% -1.36% $1.33B /pd-vs-gtm β†’

2. Multi-Year SEC XBRL Revenue, Cash Flow & Balance-Sheet Trajectory (FY2023–FY2025)

SEC EDGAR 10-K β€’ FILED 2025-12-31 β€’ CIK 0001794515

In its most recent audited fiscal period (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31), ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (GTM) reported GAAP revenue of $1.25B (+2.9% vs. FY2024 revenue of $1.21B , and +0.8% cumulative change since FY2023) , GAAP net income of $124.2M, operating cash flow of $465.4M, and free cash flow of $465.4M (+26.0% YoY). On the balance sheet, GTM closed FY2025 with $6.44B in total assets against $1.32B in total debt (Altman Z-Score: 0.53, Piotroski F-Score: 7/9).

Fiscal Period Filing Date Revenue Net Income Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Total Assets Total Debt
FY2025 (FY) 2025-12-31 $1.25B $124.2M $465.4M $465.4M $6.44B $1.32B
FY2024 (FY) 2024-12-31 $1.21B $29.1M $369.4M $369.4M $6.47B $1.22B
FY2023 (FY) 2023-12-31 $1.24B $107.3M $434.9M $434.9M β€” β€”

3. GTM Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

βœ“ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is GTM stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-03, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (NASDAQ: GTM) is rated D+ (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 52/100 at a spot price of $4.31 (-1.15% 1D, market cap $1.27B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 11/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 9/20, Executive Insider Alignment 12/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 13/20. Across 714 tracked Technology issuers, GTM ranks #319 in composite RQD confidence.

How does GTM compare to RDVT and BBAI in the Technology sector?

Within the Technology sector (Computer Software: Prepackaged Software), GTM carries a Roarable D+ (52/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 10.5x, gross margin of 84.0%, and ROIC of 6.7%. By comparison, RDVT (Red Violet Inc.) holds a C+ grade (68/100 RQD, P/E 98.2x, ROIC 16.1%, cap $1.28B) and BBAI (BigBear.ai Inc.) posts a E grade (28/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -27.5%, cap $1.25B). Among the 5-stock peer group, PD leads on earnings multiple (7.9x) while RDVT leads on capital efficiency (16.1% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for GTM?

Per GTM's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001794515), ZoomInfo Technologies Inc generated $1.25B in revenue (+2.9% YoY), $124.2M in net income, and $465.4M in free cash flow against $6.44B in total assets and $1.32B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.. Primary risk factors monitored: Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is GTM trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

GTM last traded at $4.31 (-1.15% on volume of 4,626,086 shares), positioning the stock +7.75% above its 50-day simple moving average ($4.00) and -8.88% below its 200-day simple moving average ($4.73). Across its 52-week range of $2.54 to $12.31, GTM sits at the 18.1% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 58.6 (BULLISH MOMENTUM) and an implied next-earnings move of Β±10.8% ($3.84 to $4.78).

ROARABLE RATING BRIEF β€’ RQD 52/100 (D+) βœ“ STAGE-C NUMBER FIREWALL VERIFIED

GTM β€” ZoomInfo Technologies Inc: What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Engine: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
As of: 2026-11-02T15:29:43Z

1. Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

GTM scores 53 out of 100 with a letter grade of D+, labeled "Roarable Sell β€” Weak Fundamentals / Trim." The fundamental cash engine pillar scores 11 out of 20 (ROIC 6.7%; FCF yield 0%), indicating that returns on invested capital are modest and free-cash-flow yield on the current market value is shown as zero in the source data. The whale 13F flow pillar scores 10 out of 20, reflecting institutional accumulation and options positioning that the rating characterizes as mid-to-weak. The insider conviction pillar scores 13 out of 20, based on SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. The macro regime fit pillar scores 7 out of 20 with a beta of 1.0 and a sector-sensitivity read. The forensic balance sheet pillar scores 12 out of 20, supported by an Altman Z-Score of 0.53, a Piotroski F-Score of 7 out of 9, and a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.87.

For a prospective investor evaluating the stock today, the rating's central message is that the strongest pillar (insider conviction) is not enough to offset the weakest (macro regime fit) and the low cash-return metrics. The upside case rests on the low trailing and forward earnings multiples relative to the stock's own 52-week history, while the valuation tradeoff is that low multiples here coexist with a weak Altman Z-Score and a zero FCF yield on market value. The forensic metrics suggest financial strain that the Piotroski score partially offsets. Second-order, a beta of 1.0 means the stock is expected to move roughly with the market, so macro-driven drawdowns in the broad market would transmit directly to this name.

2. Business Model, Unit Margins & SEC Financial Trajectory

Is a NASDAQ-listed issuer in the Technology sector, operating within the Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry. β€” for specific products, customer segments, or revenue model details. The source data reports gross margin of 84%, operating margin of 18.1%, and net margin of 9.9%, which are consistent with a high-margin software business, but the source does not describe the business model in further detail.

Revenue moved from $1.24B (FY 2023) to $1.21B (FY 2024) and then $1.25B (FY 2025), while net income ranged from $29.1M to $124.2M across the three periods. Per the market data, the operating margin is 18.1%, net margin is 9.9%, and ROIC is 6.7%. The Altman Z-Score is 0.53 and the Piotroski F-Score is 7 out of 9, with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.87; the Altman figure sits in the rating's forensic pillar as a distress-risk indicator. Reported debt rose from $1.22B (FY 2024) to $1.32B (FY 2025), while cash rose from $139.9M to $175.9M over the same period.

3. Institutional Bull vs. Bear Thesis & Valuation Tradeoff

  • πŸ‚ Primary Bull Case: Trailing P/E of 10.5 and forward P/E of 9.8 with 84% gross margin and FY 2025 FCF of $465.4M sit against a 52-week range low of $2.54 and a current price of $4.48. With Fundamental Cash Engine at 11/20 (ROIC 6.7%, FCF yield β€”) and Institutional Whale Flow at 9/20, sustained execution supports upside toward the top of the $2.54 – $12.31 52-week range.
  • 🐻 Primary Bear Case: Altman Z-Score of 0.53, Debt/Equity of 0.87, reported debt of $1.32B against cash of $175.9M, and a 0% FCF yield signal balance-sheet and cash-return strain. Investors must weigh 10.5x trailing P/E and 10.8x EV/EBITDA against 18.1% operating margins and a 1.00 macro beta if sector demand softens.

4. 2nd-Order Butterfly Ripples & Key Questions to Watch

β€” The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph reports supply_chain as NONE, with an empty butterfly_links array and an empty proprietary_signals array. No upstream or downstream dependencies, sector correlations, or 2nd-order bottlenecks are identified in the source. The only sector-level context available is the Technology sector and Computer Software: Prepackaged Software industry classification, and the RQD macro regime fit pillar's sector-sensitivity read.

  • Key Question #1: What is the composition of the zero FCF yield: is the 0% value a data gap, or does it reflect current market value versus reported FCF of $465.4M (FY 2025)?
  • Key Question #2: What drove the gap between FY 2025 operating income ($225.7M) and net income ($124.2M), and how much of that gap is interest expense on the $1.32B debt load?
  • Key Question #3: What is the rationale behind the reported CRO sale and CFO tax withholding, and do they represent discretionary or mechanical transactions?

GTM Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc (GTM) β€’ Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

πŸ’¬ Jump to GTM Debate Forum (3) ↓
πŸ”₯ THE ROAR PIT β€’ LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

GTM Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board β€” What's Your Call at $4.31?

πŸ‚ 67% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON GTM 🐻 33% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on GTM:
πŸ’‘ Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
CA CashFlowKing FCF Compounder Hunter πŸ‚ BULLISH 🎯 Target: $5.23 (+20.0%)
πŸ“Œ Pinned Debate

Trailing P/E of 10.5 and forward P/E of 9.8 with 84% gross margin and FY 2025 FCF of $465.4M sit against a 52-week range low of $2.54 a

Long GTM at $4.36 targeting $5.23. Trailing P/E of 10.5 and forward P/E of 9.8 with 84% gross margin and FY 2025 FCF of $465.4M sit against a 52-week range low of $2.54 and a current price of $4.48.. Institutional whale score is 9/20 and the risk/reward vs. the $2.54 52-week low is skewed heavily in favor of bulls.

VolSurface_Trader πŸ‚ BULL

Both sides have a point here β€” GTM's 12/20 balance sheet score keeps downside contained, so the real swing factor next earnings call is backlog and FCF conversion.

RE RedlineAuditor Accounting Quality Watch 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $3.53 (-19.0%)
Spot @ $4.36

Altman Z-Score of 0.53, Debt/Equity of 0.87, reported debt of $1.32B against cash of $175.9M, and a 0% FCF yield signal balance-sheet

Here is the bear case nobody on the bull side wants to address on GTM: Altman Z-Score of 0.53, Debt/Equity of 0.87, reported debt of $1.32B against cash of $175.9M, and a 0% FCF yield signal balance-sheet and cash-return strain.. At 10.5x trailing P/E, even a small guidance miss in Computer Software: Prepackaged Software triggers a 12-15% air pocket.

LIVE TAPE SPY $752.10 -1.80% QQQ $681.09 -3.60% DIA $519.34 -1.08% IWM $279.14 -1.68% NVDA $202.06 -1.26% AAPL $338.32 -1.83% MSFT $507.12 -2.83% TSLA $403.82 +1.00% PLTR $178.34 -3.13% SOFI $16.60 -0.95% IBIT $43.35 -5.42% GLD $361.65 -3.59%