Prologis Inc. (PLD) Revenue-to-Profit Sankey Flow & SEC XBRL Financials

$127.98 -0.03% NYSE β€’ Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $127.73

Prologis Inc. (PLD) carries a Roarable Rating of D+ (Sell) with 58/100 RQD Confidence due to weak cash-flow efficiency and sensitivity to current interest rates. Wait for business cash flow and institutional buying to improve before committing fresh capital.

ROARABLE D+ β€’ SELL / AVOID Cap $121.68B
πŸ“€ Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚑ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW β€’ $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on PLD Below β€” or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
πŸ€– Mara Quenwick β€’ AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is PLD stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
β–Ό

As of 2026-11-02, Prologis Inc. (NYSE: PLD) is rated D+ (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 58/100 at a spot price of $127.98 (-0.03% 1D, market cap $121.68B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 13/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 9/20, Executive Insider Alignment 15/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 14/20. Across 1096 tracked Financials issuers, PLD ranks #476 in composite RQD confidence.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Ellis Vennor β€’ AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does PLD compare to EQIX and WELL in the Financials sector?
β–Ό

Within the Financials sector (Real Estate Investment Trusts), PLD carries a Roarable D+ (58/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 36.6x, gross margin of β€”, and ROIC of 5.0%. By comparison, EQIX (Equinix Inc.) holds a C grade (65/100 RQD, P/E 76.0x, ROIC 6.3%, cap $102.62B) and WELL (Welltower Inc.) posts a C grade (63/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC 1.9%, cap $171.06B). Among the 5-stock peer group, AMT leads on earnings multiple (22.8x) while AMT leads on capital efficiency (15.7% ROIC).

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Gideon Ashmere β€’ AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for PLD?
β–Ό

Per PLD's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001045609), Prologis Inc. generated $8.79B in revenue (+7.2% YoY), $3.33B in net income, and $4.61B in free cash flow against $98.72B in total assets and $18.44B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Company leadership has skin in the game with net positive insider conviction.. Primary risk factors monitored: Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists β€” not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
πŸ›‘οΈ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $127.72 (-0.20%)🧬 Cannibal Buyback (-1.80% YoY Shares)βš™οΈ Cash Engine: 13/20 (C) β€’ 52.5% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit β†’
πŸ“Š Historical Track Record: Scores of 58/100 (D+) historically posted market-perform odds over rolling 90-day windows (+0.0% avg 90D alpha vs SPY β€’ 52.7% hit rate β€” wait for RQD β‰₯ 70 breakout).
Audit Bucket Track Record β†’
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERSELL / AVOID β€’ D+
025507510058
JEV AI Jury Split (Battleground)
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) β€” not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR SNOWFLAKE RADARRw C- Β· Rk D+
Cash (13)Whales (9)SEC (15)Macro (7)CEO (14)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE+0% Base Target
$161 Bull$128 Base$100 Bear
πŸ“¬ FREE PLD RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: β€” (No Active Options Snapshot on file for PLD)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: Β±4.6%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (58/100 Composite)
πŸ” WHY PLD SCORES 58/100 (D+) β€” TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
β–² #1 Bullish Driver: SEC 10-K Forensic Risk+15/20 pts (26% of score)

Altman Z-Score 3.80 (FORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)) β€’ Piotroski F-Score 8/9

β–² #2 Bullish Driver: Insider Conviction & Share Dilution+14/20 pts (24% of score)

SEC Form 4 / 13F Thermometer: 70% Net Buy β€’ Cannibal Buyback (-1.80% YoY Shares)

β–Ό #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Macro Regime Fit7/20 pts (-13 pt drag)

Macro rate sensitivity & RSI-14 (46.4) create a -13 pt regime headwind

πŸ“ˆ PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 β†’ Q2 β†’ Q3 β†’ Current
Q1 (-3Q)
66
Grade B-$133.55-4.6% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
63
Grade C+$127.47-0.8% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
61
Grade C$126.47+1.2% Next Q
Current
58
Grade D+$127.98+0% Hist 90D Ξ±
Trajectory: B- (66) β†’ D+ (58)Full Audit β†’
βš”οΈ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)GIDEON ASHMERE // FORENSIC SHORT & KILL-SWITCH DOSSIER

βš”οΈ Adversarial Opposing Case: Why the PLD Bull Thesis Could Fail

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk β†’

Even with a 58/100 (D+) score, PLD faces multiple-compression risk if 36.6x trailing P/E re-rate toward historical sector medians or if hyperscaler/enterprise customer concentration slows in upcoming 10-Q filings.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #1

Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #2

Dilution & Margin Drag: Cannibal Buyback (-1.80% YoY Shares) β€” any gross margin slip below 49.5% triggers an automatic RQD downgrade.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #3

Technical & Forensic Kill-Switch: A daily close below the 50D SMA ($132.37) or 200D SMA ($137.80) invalidates the momentum regime and cuts Target Base ($127.98) toward Bear Floor ($99.82).

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $PLDβ€’ $2.4M Crowd Pool β€’ Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: β€œPLD Beats Next Quarter EPS Consensus (Dec 30, 2026) & Holds Above 200D SMA”
VISUAL REVENUE-TO-PROFIT SANKEY WATERFALL β€’ FY 2025 (10-K)

How PLD Turns Every Dollar of Sales Into Real Bottom-Line Profit

Free Cash Flow:$4.61B (52.5% FCF Margin)
Revenue$8.79BGross Profit $4.57B (52%)Cost of Sales $4.22BOp Profit $4.36B (49.6%)OpEx (R&D/SG&A) $213.0MNet Profit$3.33B (37.9%)Tax/Other $1.03B

Multi-Year SEC EDGAR XBRL Revenue, Net Profit & Free Cash Flow Trajectory

β–  Revenueβ–  Net Profitβ–  Free Cash Flow
FY23
Rev $8.02B
FY24
Rev $8.20B
FY25
Rev $8.79B
Fiscal YearRevenueGross MarginOp MarginNet ProfitFree Cash FlowROIC %
FY 2025$8.79B52%49.6%$3.33B$4.61B4.9%
FY 2024$8.20B52%53.8%$3.73B$4.54B5%
FY 2023$8.02B52%46.2%$3.06B$5.01B7.2%
ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP β€’ SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Forensic Quant Desk

Red-Light Warning Desk: Spotting SEC Cash-Flow & Dilution Risks Before Downgrades (Featuring PLD)

  • βœ“Walkthrough of PLD's RQD Radar, SEC cash-conversion gap & downside invalidation levels
  • βœ“3 asymmetric Bear/Hedge frameworks when 10-year Treasury yields stay elevated
  • βœ“Includes nightly RQD rating-change & forensic signal email alerts on your tracked stocks
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
PLD // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: -7.77%β–Ό DESCENDING CHANNEL
2026-11-02O $125.2H $128.0L $125.2C $128.0VOL 3.47M
RES: $132.9SUP: $120.3SMA50: $132.4SMA200: $137.8
$155.4$146.8$138.1$129.4$120.7RES $132.9SUP $120.3$128.02026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-02
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

PLD Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

Share Count & Dilution Monitor (#25)

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle (#30)
28.1%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +7.2% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger (#33)

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on PLD today. View full Setup Ledger β†’

πŸ¦‹ Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph β†’

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for PLD. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for PLD today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk β†’
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT β€’ SEC EDGAR XBRL Γ— RQD PEER BENCHMARK

πŸ“Š Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (PLD)

1. Head-to-Head Financials Peer Comparison (PLD vs. EQIX, WELL, AMT, SPG)

Industry: Real Estate Investment Trusts (172 Tracked Issuers)

Across 1096 tracked Financials securities in the Roarable RQD universe, Prologis Inc. (PLD) ranks #476 by composite RQD confidence (58/100, grade D+) and #27 by equity capitalization ($121.68B). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, AMT leads on earnings valuation at 22.8x trailing P/E, while AMT leads on capital efficiency and profitability with 15.7% ROIC and β€” gross margin. SPG currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 74/100 (B) compared with PLD at 58/100 (D+).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
PLD ACTIVE
Prologis Inc.
D+ 58/100 36.6x β€” 5.0% -0.03% $121.68B Benchmark Subject
EQIX
Equinix Inc.
C 65/100 76.0x β€” 6.3% -2.22% $102.62B /eqix-vs-pld β†’
WELL
Welltower Inc.
C 63/100 β€” β€” 1.9% +0.61% $171.06B /well-vs-pld β†’
AMT
American Tower Corporation
B- 71/100 22.8x β€” 15.7% +1.02% $86.20B /amt-vs-pld β†’
SPG
Simon Property Group Inc.
B 74/100 28.2x β€” 13.5% +0.94% $69.80B /spg-vs-pld β†’

2. Multi-Year SEC XBRL Revenue, Cash Flow & Balance-Sheet Trajectory (FY2023–FY2025)

SEC EDGAR 10-K β€’ FILED 2025-12-31 β€’ CIK 0001045609

In its most recent audited fiscal period (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31), Prologis Inc. (PLD) reported GAAP revenue of $8.79B (+7.2% vs. FY2024 revenue of $8.20B , and +9.6% cumulative change since FY2023) , GAAP net income of $3.33B, operating cash flow of $5.01B, and free cash flow of $4.61B (+1.5% YoY). On the balance sheet, PLD closed FY2025 with $98.72B in total assets against $18.44B in total debt (Altman Z-Score: N/A, Piotroski F-Score: 8/9).

Fiscal Period Filing Date Revenue Net Income Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Total Assets Total Debt
FY2025 (FY) 2025-12-31 $8.79B $3.33B $5.01B $4.61B $98.72B $18.44B
FY2024 (FY) 2024-12-31 $8.20B $3.73B $4.91B $4.54B $95.33B $16.52B
FY2023 (FY) 2023-12-31 $8.02B $3.06B $5.37B $5.01B $66.93B $15.66B

3. PLD Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

βœ“ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is PLD stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-02, Prologis Inc. (NYSE: PLD) is rated D+ (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 58/100 at a spot price of $127.98 (-0.03% 1D, market cap $121.68B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 13/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 9/20, Executive Insider Alignment 15/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 14/20. Across 1096 tracked Financials issuers, PLD ranks #476 in composite RQD confidence.

How does PLD compare to EQIX and WELL in the Financials sector?

Within the Financials sector (Real Estate Investment Trusts), PLD carries a Roarable D+ (58/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 36.6x, gross margin of β€”, and ROIC of 5.0%. By comparison, EQIX (Equinix Inc.) holds a C grade (65/100 RQD, P/E 76.0x, ROIC 6.3%, cap $102.62B) and WELL (Welltower Inc.) posts a C grade (63/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC 1.9%, cap $171.06B). Among the 5-stock peer group, AMT leads on earnings multiple (22.8x) while AMT leads on capital efficiency (15.7% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for PLD?

Per PLD's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001045609), Prologis Inc. generated $8.79B in revenue (+7.2% YoY), $3.33B in net income, and $4.61B in free cash flow against $98.72B in total assets and $18.44B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Company leadership has skin in the game with net positive insider conviction.. Primary risk factors monitored: Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is PLD trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

PLD last traded at $127.98 (-0.03% on volume of 4,332,456 shares), positioning the stock -3.32% below its 50-day simple moving average ($132.37) and -7.13% below its 200-day simple moving average ($137.80). Across its 52-week range of $121.40 to $153.35, PLD sits at the 20.6% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 46.4 (NEUTRAL RANGE) and an implied next-earnings move of Β±4.6% ($122.09 to $133.87).

PLD Investor FAQ & Complete 8-Part Research Index

100% OPEN ACCESS β€’ SEC EDGAR Γ— CBOE Γ— FRED

How profitable is Prologis Inc. (PLD)?

In FY 2025 (10-K), PLD converted $8.8B of revenue into a 52% gross margin, 49.6% operating margin, and $4.6B in free cash flow (52.5% FCF margin).

ROARABLE RATING BRIEF β€’ RQD 58/100 (D+) βœ“ STAGE-C NUMBER FIREWALL VERIFIED

PLD β€” Prologis Inc.: What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Engine: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
As of: 2026-11-02T15:09:31Z

Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

The per-the Roarable RQD rating assigns a score of 58 (letter grade D+, verdict "Roarable Sell β€” Weak Fundamentals / Trim") across five pillars:

  • Fundamental Cash Engine: 13 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of 5% and an FCF yield of 3.79%. Modest return on invested capital paired with a moderate free-cash-flow yield limits the cash-generation case relative to the valuation the market is currently paying.
  • Whale 13F Flow: 9 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, institutional accumulation and options positioning score weakly, indicating less visible large-holder conviction in the source data.
  • Insider Conviction: 14 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow contribute a middling score; the source data does not provide the underlying transactions.
  • Macro Regime Fit: 7 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, beta of 1.02 and sector sensitivity produce the lowest pillar score, suggesting limited alignment with the current macro regime as scored.
  • Forensic Balance Sheet: 15 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, Altman Z of 2.5, Piotroski F of 8/9, and Debt/Equity of 0.5 are the strongest pillar, indicating balance-sheet resilience.

For a prospective investor, the implication is that the balance sheet is the most supportive element, while valuation (P/E TTM of 36.6 and EV/EBITDA of 29.3 per the market data), weak ROIC, and low macro-fit scores weigh against the stock. Upside drivers would need to come from improved return on capital or a valuation re-rating; the tradeoff is paying a premium multiple for a business whose scored return profile is currently modest. This is analytical context, not personalized advice.

Snapshot

PriceMarket CapP/E (TTM)Forward P/EEV/EBITDAEPS (TTM)Dividend YieldBeta52-Wk RangeROIC %
128.02$121.68B36.63429.33.53.09%1.02$121.4 - $153.355%

Financial Trend

PeriodRevenueOperating IncomeNet IncomeEPSFCFCashDebt
FY 2025$8790.1M$4357.9M$3328.2MN/A$4612.9M$1145.6M$18436.6M
FY 2024$8201.6M$4415.9M$3731.6MN/A$4543.1M$1318.6M$16520.5M
FY 2023$8023.5M$3707.8M$3059.2MN/A$5012.0MN/A$15660.8M

Per the SEC financials, revenue rose from $8023.5M (FY 2023) to $8790.1M (FY 2025), while net income moved from $3059.2M to $3328.2M after peaking at $3731.6M in FY 2024. Per the market data, ROIC is 5% and the gross margin is listed as 0%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.5 and the Piotroski F-Score is 8/9. Debt/Equity is 0.5 per the Roarable RQD rating; debt rose from $15660.8M to $18436.6M over the reported periods while cash declined in FY 2025 to $1145.6M.

Recent Catalysts & News Wire Analysis

  • Catalyst (GREEN): "Prologis (PLD) Stock Gets Fair Value Trim As Analysts Rework Growth And Cost Assumptions" (Yahoo Finance, 1h ago).
  • Market Wire (YELLOW): "Amid the Weakness, Data Center Trade Prologis Stock Offers an Incredible Deal" (Barchart.com, 3h ago).
  • Market Wire (YELLOW): "Prologis (PLD) Draws Fresh Ownership Focus, Is The Stock Still Undervalued?" (Yahoo Finance, 6h ago).
  • Catalyst (GREEN): "Prologis: The Sell-Off Created A Buying Opportunity (Rating Upgrade)" (Seeking Alpha, 9h ago).
  • Risk Watch (RED): "Prologis (PLD) Stock Slips After Q3 Earnings Expose Dilution Risk" (Yahoo Finance, 12h ago).
  • Catalyst (GREEN): "How Earnings Beat Will Impact Prologis Stock (PLD)" (Yahoo Finance, 15h ago).

Per the butterfly supply-chain graph, the supply_chain field is NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals recorded. The headlines are the only catalyst source; their content beyond headline text is not provided.

Open Questions

  • What are the specific drivers behind the RQD sub-scores, particularly the 7/20 macro-regime fit and the 9/20 whale flow, given that the source data contains no underlying 13F or Form 4 transactions?
  • What caused the "Dilution Risk" headline referenced in the Risk Watch item, and what is the share-count history in the source data?
  • Which portion of the $18436.6M debt is current versus long-term, and what is the maturity profile?
  • Why is FY 2025 EPS and FY 2024 EPS listed as N/A, and how does that affect verification of the 3.5 TTM EPS figure?
  • What is the reason for the cash balance declining from $1318.6M to $1145.6M, and is the FY 2023 cash figure (N/A) recoverable from another source?

PLD Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for Prologis Inc. (PLD) β€’ Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

πŸ’¬ Jump to PLD Debate Forum (3) ↓
πŸ”₯ THE ROAR PIT β€’ LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

PLD Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board β€” What's Your Call at $127.98?

πŸ‚ 50% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON PLD 🐻 50% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on PLD:
πŸ’‘ Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
RO RoarDesk_Moderator Roarable Research Desk βš–οΈ DEBATE HOST 🎯 Target: $138.26 (+8.0%)
πŸ“Œ Pinned Debate

πŸ”₯ Official Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is PLD (D+ β€’ RQD 58/100) a Buy at $128.02?

Welcome to the PLD (Prologis Inc.) Roar Pit. Current RQD Composite is 58/100 (Roarable Sell β€” Weak Fundamentals / Trim) in Real Estate Investment Trusts. Bulls point to operating leverage and sector positioning, while bears focus on valuation multiple compression (36.6x trailing P/E). Pick your side (πŸ‚ Bull or 🐻 Bear) and drop your price target below.

SH ShortSeller_Dan Forensic Accounting Watch 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $99.86 (-22.0%)
Spot @ $128.02

Pump the brakes on PLD β€” check the valuation vs. margin headwinds

Everyone in here is repeating the bull case on PLD, but look at what you are paying: 36.6x trailing P/E with tightening sector spreads. Unless Prologis Inc. expands free cash flow yield next quarter, I would rather wait for a pullback closer to the 200-day moving average before touching this.

AL AlphaFlow_Cap Verified K Arena Trader πŸ‚ BULLISH 🎯 Target: $147.22 (+15.0%)
Spot @ $128.02

PLD cash flow & RQD setup is being underpriced by the Street here

Looking at the 5-pillar RQD breakdown on PLD, the market is fixating on short-term headline noise in Real Estate Investment Trusts and ignoring the balance sheet and cash flow trajectory. At $128.02 (52-wk range $121.40 - $153.35), any beat on forward guidance forces shorts and underweight funds to chase.

LIVE TAPE SPY $755.72 -0.38% QQQ $690.49 -1.44% DIA $517.13 -0.37% IWM $279.33 +0.96% NVDA $204.64 -4.22% AAPL $344.63 -1.23% MSFT $521.91 -1.55% TSLA $399.81 -0.86% PLTR $184.11 -6.27% SOFI $16.76 -4.83% IBIT $43.36 -0.94% GLD $355.78 -1.34%