W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

$73.86 +1.04% NYSE β€’ Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $74.18

W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) earns a Roarable Rating of B (Buy) with 74/100 RQD Confidence. High-quality cash engine (steady margins, 8% return on capital) with steady institutional support. The company’s underlying cash engine and institutional positioning keep the composite score in the Green Buy zone.

ROARABLE B β€’ BUY Cap $27.14B
πŸ“€ Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚑ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW β€’ $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on WRB Below β€” or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
πŸ€– Mara Quenwick β€’ AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is WRB stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
β–Ό

As of 2026-11-02, W.R. Berkley Corporation (NYSE: WRB) is rated B (Buy / BUY) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 74/100 at a spot price of $73.86 (+1.04% 1D, market cap $27.14B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 14/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 13/20, Executive Insider Alignment 15/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 15/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 17/20. Across 1096 tracked Financials issuers, WRB ranks #44 in composite RQD confidence.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Ellis Vennor β€’ AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does WRB compare to CINF and MKL in the Financials sector?
β–Ό

Within the Financials sector (Property-Casualty Insurers), WRB carries a Roarable B (74/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 15.3x, gross margin of β€”, and ROIC of 8.0%. By comparison, CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) holds a B+ grade (77/100 RQD, P/E 11.7x, ROIC 9.2%, cap $27.92B) and MKL (Markel Group Inc.) posts a C grade (65/100 RQD, P/E 10.8x, ROIC 7.1%, cap $22.83B). Among the 5-stock peer group, HIG leads on earnings multiple (9.2x) while HIG leads on capital efficiency (28.4% ROIC).

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Gideon Ashmere β€’ AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for WRB?
β–Ό

Per WRB's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0000011544), W.R. Berkley Corporation generated $14.71B in revenue (+7.8% YoY), $1.78B in net income, and $2.92B in free cash flow against $43.93B in total assets and $15.40B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Company leadership has skin in the game with net positive insider conviction.. Primary risk factors monitored: Broader market pullbacks can still drag down strong stocks in the short run.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists β€” not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
πŸ›‘οΈ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $74.18 (+0.43%)🧬 Cannibal Buyback (-2.64% YoY Shares)βš™οΈ Cash Engine: 14/20 (B-) β€’ 19.9% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit β†’
πŸ“Š Historical Track Record: Scores of 74/100 (B) historically ranked in the Top 12% of excess returns over the next 90 days (+7.3% avg 90D alpha vs SPY β€’ 69.4% hit rate).
Audit Bucket Track Record β†’
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERBUY β€’ B
025507510074
3-of-3 JEV AI Jury Bullish
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) β€” not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR SNOWFLAKE RADARRw B Β· Rk B
Cash (14)Whales (13)SEC (15)Macro (15)CEO (17)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE+7.2% Base Target
$93 Bull$79 Base$61 Bear
πŸ“¬ FREE WRB RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: β€” (No Active Options Snapshot on file for WRB)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: Β±4.4%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (74/100 Composite)
πŸ” WHY WRB SCORES 74/100 (B) β€” TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
β–² #1 Bullish Driver: Insider Conviction & Share Dilution+17/20 pts (23% of score)

SEC Form 4 / 13F Thermometer: 85% Net Buy β€’ Cannibal Buyback (-2.64% YoY Shares)

β–² #2 Bullish Driver: SEC 10-K Forensic Risk+15/20 pts (20% of score)

Altman Z-Score 3.80 (FORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)) β€’ Piotroski F-Score 8/9

β–Ό #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Whale & Options Positioning13/20 pts (-7 pt drag)

Put hedging (50% put share) caps near-term gamma upside (-7 pts vs max)

πŸ“ˆ PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 β†’ Q2 β†’ Q3 β†’ Current
Q1 (-3Q)
66
Grade B-$73.55-0.5% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
69
Grade B-$73.15-1.1% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
71
Grade B$72.38+2% Next Q
Current
74
Grade B$73.86+7.3% Hist 90D Ξ±
Trajectory: B- (66) β†’ B (74)Full Audit β†’
βš”οΈ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)GIDEON ASHMERE // FORENSIC SHORT & KILL-SWITCH DOSSIER

βš”οΈ Adversarial Opposing Case: Why the WRB Bull Thesis Could Fail

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk β†’

Even with a 74/100 (B) score, WRB faces multiple-compression risk if 15.3x trailing P/E re-rate toward historical sector medians or if hyperscaler/enterprise customer concentration slows in upcoming 10-Q filings.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #1

Broader market pullbacks can still drag down strong stocks in the short run.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #2

Dilution & Margin Drag: Cannibal Buyback (-2.64% YoY Shares) β€” any gross margin slip below 49.5% triggers an automatic RQD downgrade.

⚠️ Forensic Kill-Switch #3

Technical & Forensic Kill-Switch: A daily close below the 50D SMA ($70.64) or 200D SMA ($69.27) invalidates the momentum regime and cuts Target Base ($79.18) toward Bear Floor ($60.57).

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $WRBβ€’ $2.4M Crowd Pool β€’ Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: β€œWRB Beats Next Quarter EPS Consensus (Dec 30, 2026) & Holds Above 200D SMA”
SEC FORM 4 Γ— 13F HEDGE FUNDS Γ— CONGRESSIONAL STOCK ACT

WRB Smart-Money Thermometer: HEAVY INSIDER & 13F ACCUMULATION

Explore All 13F & Congress Whales β†’
β–² Disclosed Buys: 0 ($0)β–Ό Disclosed Sales: 0 ($0)

Wide-Open SEC Form 4, 13F & Congressional Disclosure Ledger (WRB)

No recent open-market Form 4 cluster sales or emergency dumps flagged on WRB. Visit the Global 13F & Congressional Whale Ledger for cross-market smart-money filings.

ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP β€’ SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Quantitative Research Desk

Scheduled RQD Strong Buys & Whale Accumulation Briefing (WRB Tape Review)

  • βœ“Breakdown of the highest-scoring RQD Green-Light breakouts across our 5,200+ rated universe
  • βœ“Forensic Red-Light accounting & dilution traps to review on your watchlist
  • βœ“Includes downloadable .ics calendar invite & nightly RQD rating-change email alerts
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
WRB // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: +11.37%β–Ό DESCENDING CHANNEL
2026-11-02O $71.63H $73.86L $71.63C $73.86VOL 2.19M
RES: $75.67SUP: $65.09SMA50: $70.64SMA200: $69.27
$78.47$74.24$70.01$65.79$61.56RES $75.67SUP $65.09$73.862026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-02
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

WRB Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

Share Count & Dilution Monitor (#25)

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle (#30)
7.6%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +7.8% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger (#33)

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on WRB today. View full Setup Ledger β†’

πŸ¦‹ Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph β†’

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for WRB. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for WRB today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk β†’
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT β€’ SEC EDGAR XBRL Γ— RQD PEER BENCHMARK

πŸ“Š Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (WRB)

1. Head-to-Head Financials Peer Comparison (WRB vs. CINF, MKL, L, HIG)

Industry: Property-Casualty Insurers (68 Tracked Issuers)

Across 1096 tracked Financials securities in the Roarable RQD universe, W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) ranks #44 by composite RQD confidence (74/100, grade B) and #101 by equity capitalization ($27.14B). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, HIG leads on earnings valuation at 9.2x trailing P/E, while HIG leads on capital efficiency and profitability with 28.4% ROIC and β€” gross margin. CINF currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 77/100 (B+) compared with WRB at 74/100 (B).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
WRB ACTIVE
W.R. Berkley Corporation
B 74/100 15.3x β€” 8.0% +1.04% $27.14B Benchmark Subject
CINF
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
B+ 77/100 11.7x β€” 9.2% -0.37% $27.92B /cinf-vs-wrb β†’
MKL
Markel Group Inc.
C 65/100 10.8x β€” 7.1% +0.14% $22.83B /mkl-vs-wrb β†’
L
Loews Corporation
C+ 69/100 13.7x β€” 4.4% -0.33% $22.83B /l-vs-wrb β†’
HIG
The Hartford Insurance Group Inc.
B- 70/100 9.2x β€” 28.4% +0.40% $35.31B /hig-vs-wrb β†’

2. Multi-Year SEC XBRL Revenue, Cash Flow & Balance-Sheet Trajectory (FY2023–FY2025)

SEC EDGAR 10-K β€’ FILED 2025-12-31 β€’ CIK 0000011544

In its most recent audited fiscal period (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31), W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) reported GAAP revenue of $14.71B (+7.8% vs. FY2024 revenue of $13.64B , and +21.1% cumulative change since FY2023) , GAAP net income of $1.78B, operating cash flow of $3.58B, and free cash flow of $2.92B (-4.7% YoY). On the balance sheet, WRB closed FY2025 with $43.93B in total assets against $15.40B in total debt (Altman Z-Score: N/A, Piotroski F-Score: 8/9).

Fiscal Period Filing Date Revenue Net Income Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Total Assets Total Debt
FY2025 (FY) 2025-12-31 $14.71B $1.78B $3.58B $2.92B $43.93B $15.40B
FY2024 (FY) 2024-12-31 $13.64B $1.76B $3.68B $3.06B $40.57B $14.47B
FY2023 (FY) 2023-12-31 $12.14B $1.38B $2.93B $2.38B $14.93B $3.49B

3. WRB Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

βœ“ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is WRB stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-02, W.R. Berkley Corporation (NYSE: WRB) is rated B (Buy / BUY) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 74/100 at a spot price of $73.86 (+1.04% 1D, market cap $27.14B). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 14/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 13/20, Executive Insider Alignment 15/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 15/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 17/20. Across 1096 tracked Financials issuers, WRB ranks #44 in composite RQD confidence.

How does WRB compare to CINF and MKL in the Financials sector?

Within the Financials sector (Property-Casualty Insurers), WRB carries a Roarable B (74/100 RQD), trailing P/E of 15.3x, gross margin of β€”, and ROIC of 8.0%. By comparison, CINF (Cincinnati Financial Corporation) holds a B+ grade (77/100 RQD, P/E 11.7x, ROIC 9.2%, cap $27.92B) and MKL (Markel Group Inc.) posts a C grade (65/100 RQD, P/E 10.8x, ROIC 7.1%, cap $22.83B). Among the 5-stock peer group, HIG leads on earnings multiple (9.2x) while HIG leads on capital efficiency (28.4% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for WRB?

Per WRB's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0000011544), W.R. Berkley Corporation generated $14.71B in revenue (+7.8% YoY), $1.78B in net income, and $2.92B in free cash flow against $43.93B in total assets and $15.40B in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Company leadership has skin in the game with net positive insider conviction.. Primary risk factors monitored: Broader market pullbacks can still drag down strong stocks in the short run.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is WRB trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

WRB last traded at $73.86 (+1.04% on volume of 2,545,974 shares), positioning the stock +4.56% above its 50-day simple moving average ($70.64) and +6.63% above its 200-day simple moving average ($69.27). Across its 52-week range of $62.87 to $78.96, WRB sits at the 68.3% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 53.5 (NEUTRAL RANGE) and an implied next-earnings move of Β±4.4% ($70.61 to $77.11).

WRB Investor FAQ & Complete 8-Part Research Index

100% OPEN ACCESS β€’ SEC EDGAR Γ— CBOE Γ— FRED

Are WRB insiders and hedge funds buying or selling?

Roarable's SEC Form 4 and 13F Whale Thermometer currently classifies WRB leadership and institutional positioning as: HEAVY INSIDER & 13F ACCUMULATION.

ROARABLE RATING BRIEF β€’ RQD 74/100 (B) βœ“ STAGE-C NUMBER FIREWALL VERIFIED

WRB β€” W.R. Berkley Corporation: What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Engine: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
As of: 2026-11-02T15:12:41Z

Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

Per the Roarable RQD rating, WRB scores 74 out of 100, a letter grade of B, labeled "Roarable Buy β€” Good Risk/Reward." The five pillars are:

  • Fundamental Cash Engine (14 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of 8% and an FCF yield of 10.76%. For a prospective investor, the high FCF yield is an upside driver if cash generation persists, but the 8% ROIC is a more modest return on capital and should be weighed against the valuation.
  • Whale 13F Flow (13 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects institutional accumulation and options positioning. The score is the second-lowest of the five pillars, indicating less institutional conviction signal than the other pillars.
  • Insider Conviction (17 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this is the highest pillar, reflecting SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. Strong insider signal is generally read as a supportive factor, though the underlying transactions are not itemized in the source data.
  • Macro Regime Fit (15 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this reflects beta of 0.89 and sector sensitivity. A beta below 1.0 implies lower sensitivity to broad market moves than the market average, which may appeal to investors seeking moderate volatility.
  • Forensic Balance Sheet (15 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this reflects Altman Z of 2.5, Piotroski F of 8/9, and Debt/Equity of 0.5. A high Piotroski score and moderate leverage are supportive; the Altman Z of 2.5 sits in the range the rating framework treats as a moderate-risk zone rather than a clear safety signal.

Valuation tradeoff: at a price of 73.1 and a P/E (TTM) of 15.3, the stock trades within the 52-week range of $62.87 – $78.96. Investors should weigh the verdict against the fact that the score is driven more by insider and cash-flow factors than by institutional flow.

Snapshot

PriceMarket CapP/E (TTM)Forward P/EEV/EBITDAEPS (TTM)Dividend YieldBeta52-Wk RangeROIC %
73.1$27.14B15.314.214.34.792.58%0.89$62.87 - $78.968%

Financial Trend

PeriodRevenueOperating IncomeNet IncomeEPSFCFCashDebt
FY 2025$14707.9M$2099.2M$1779.0MN/A$2920.8M$2539.9M$15396.7M
FY 2024$13638.8M$2072.1M$1756.0MN/A$3064.6M$1974.7M$14471.9M
FY 2023$12142.9M$1629.6M$1381.0MN/A$2382.8MN/A$3492.5M

Per the market data, operating margin is 14.8%, net margin is 12.1%, and ROIC is 8%. Gross margin is reported as 0%. The Altman Z-Score (2.5) and Piotroski F-Score (8/9) are per the Roarable RQD rating. Debt/Equity is 0.5 per the same rating. Revenue and net income grew across the three reported periods, while reported debt rose from $3492.5M in FY 2023 to $15396.7M in FY 2025.

Recent Catalysts & News Wire Analysis

Per the recent news feed, headlines are mixed:

  • CATALYST (GREEN): Yahoo Finance reported a Q3 2026 earnings beat with revenues missing estimates and premiums rising year over year.
  • RISK WATCH (RED): Seeking Alpha reported the stock dipping as Q3 net premiums written and ROE missed estimates.
  • RISK WATCH (RED): GuruFocus reported shares slipping 4.28% after a Q3 earnings miss.
  • MARKET WIRE (YELLOW): Benzinga reported expectations for higher Q3 earnings with analysts revising forecasts ahead of earnings.
  • MARKET WIRE (YELLOW): The Globe and Mail listed WRB among analysts' top financial picks.
  • MARKET WIRE (YELLOW): A Yahoo Finance summary covered market action and institutional positioning.

The headlines conflict: earnings are described as both a beat and a miss depending on the metric. Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is listed as "NONE," with no butterfly links or proprietary signals.

Open Questions

  • What drove the divergence between "earnings beat" and "earnings/revenue miss" headlines, and which metric is authoritative for Q3 2026?
  • Which specific insider and Congressional transactions produced the 17/20 insider conviction pillar?
  • How did reported debt rise from $3492.5M (FY 2023) to $15396.7M (FY 2025), and what is the composition of that debt?
  • What is the basis for the 0% gross margin figure, and is it a data artifact or a reporting structure issue?
  • What are the EPS values for FY 2023–FY 2025, which are reported as N/A?

WRB Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) β€’ Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

πŸ’¬ Jump to WRB Debate Forum (3) ↓
πŸ”₯ THE ROAR PIT β€’ LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

WRB Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board β€” What's Your Call at $73.86?

πŸ‚ 67% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON WRB 🐻 33% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on WRB:
πŸ’‘ Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
RO RoarDesk_Moderator Roarable Research Desk πŸ‚ BULLISH 🎯 Target: $86.26 (+18.0%)
πŸ“Œ Pinned Debate

πŸ”₯ Official Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is WRB (B β€’ RQD 74/100) a Buy at $73.10?

Welcome to the WRB (W.R. Berkley Corporation) Roar Pit. Current RQD Composite is 74/100 (Roarable Buy β€” Good Risk/Reward) in Property-Casualty Insurers. Bulls point to operating leverage and sector positioning, while bears focus on macro rate sensitivity and margin execution. Pick your side (πŸ‚ Bull or 🐻 Bear) and drop your price target below.

SK SkepticalCFA Forensic Accounting Watch 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $56.29 (-23.0%)
Spot @ $73.10

Pump the brakes on WRB β€” check the valuation vs. margin headwinds

Everyone in here is repeating the bull case on WRB, but look at what you are paying: 15.3x trailing P/E with tightening sector spreads. Unless W.R. Berkley Corporation expands free cash flow yield next quarter, I would rather wait for a pullback closer to the 200-day moving average before touching this.

TA TapeReader_Pro Verified K Arena Trader πŸ‚ BULLISH 🎯 Target: $92.11 (+26.0%)
Spot @ $73.10

WRB cash flow & RQD setup is being underpriced by the Street here

Looking at the 5-pillar RQD breakdown on WRB, the market is fixating on short-term headline noise in Property-Casualty Insurers and ignoring the balance sheet and cash flow trajectory. At $73.10 (52-wk range $62.87 - $78.96), any beat on forward guidance forces shorts and underweight funds to chase.

LIVE TAPE SPY $755.72 -0.38% QQQ $690.49 -1.44% DIA $517.13 -0.37% IWM $279.33 +0.96% NVDA $204.64 -4.22% AAPL $344.63 -1.23% MSFT $521.91 -1.55% TSLA $399.81 -0.86% PLTR $184.11 -6.27% SOFI $16.76 -4.83% IBIT $43.36 -0.94% GLD $355.78 -1.34%