Climb Global Solutions Inc. (CLMB) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, CLMB carries an RQD Score of 72, a letter grade of B, and the verdict label "Roarable Buy — Good Risk/Reward." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine (13 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of 28.8% and an FCF yield of 2.13%. High capital efficiency is paired with a modest free-cash yield at the current price, indicating that the market is already pricing in a meaningful portion of the cash generation.
• Whale 13F Flow (16 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects institutional accumulation and options positioning. The source data does not itemize the underlying 13F filings, so the strength of this signal cannot be independently traced in this brief.
• Insider Conviction (15 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. The underlying transactions are not itemized in the provided sources.
• Macro Regime Fit (12 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, beta is 1.0 with sector sensitivity noted. This is the lowest-scoring pillar, suggesting the stock's behavior is tied to broader market and sector conditions rather than idiosyncratic strength.
• Forensic Balance Sheet (16 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, Altman Z is 3.35, Piotroski F is 7/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5. These figures point to a financially sound balance sheet by the rating's measures.

For a prospective investor evaluating the stock today, the rating suggests a balance between efficient capital use and a balance sheet that screens well, offset by a valuation that the market-data figures show as full (P/E TTM 36.6, EV/EBITDA 25.5) and a macro-sensitivity score that trails the other pillars. The price moved 26.29% on the session per the market data, which means recent price action has already reflected a substantial re-rating; the rating does not indicate how much of that move is sustainable.

Per the SEC financials, revenue grew from $352.0M in FY 2023 to $652.5M in FY 2025, while net income rose from $12.3M to $21.3M. Per the market data, gross margin is 16.1%, operating margin 4.5%, and net margin 3.3%, and ROIC is 28.8%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 3.35 and the Piotroski F-Score is 7/9, with Debt/Equity at 0.5. Per the SEC financials, reported free cash flow declined from $42.1M (FY 2023) to $33.7M (FY 2024) and $16.6M (FY 2025), and FY 2025 debt is reported at $0.0M.

Per the recent news feed, six items were logged, all tagged to CLMB and all carrying a YELLOW light and MARKET WIRE impact label. The headlines reference: general market action and institutional positioning (Yahoo! Finance Canada); a quality-investing screen (ChartMill); a Seeking Alpha piece with a critical headline stating the stock "Depends Too Much On Things That Have Yet To Happen"; a GuruFocus item on Q3 results and shares moving; a Yahoo Finance summary of the Q3 earnings call; and a Simply Wall St item describing a stock repricing after Q3 earnings and a "margin breakthrough." Source summaries are generic and do not state specific figures, so the content of these catalysts beyond their headlines cannot be verified here. Risk watch items per the feed include the Seeking Alpha headline's dependence-on-future-events framing. Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, no supply-chain links or proprietary signals are recorded: supply_chain is NONE, with empty butterfly links and signals.

• What products and services generate CLMB's revenue, and what share comes from each? The sources give only sector and industry labels.
• The reported EPS fields are N/A for all three periods, so how does the TTM EPS of 1.14 reconcile against reported net income and share count?
• Cash and debt are N/A for FY 2023, and the trend in free cash flow is declining across the three periods. What drove the decline, and does it reflect working capital, capital expenditure, or operating changes?
• What specific content drove the Q3 earnings-related headlines and the "margin breakthrough" description, and is it reflected in the reported margins?
• What is the identity and size of the institutional and insider positions behind the Whale 13F and Insider Conviction pillar scores?