Constellium SE (France) (CSTM) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, CSTM scores 56 out of 100, a letter grade of D+, with the verdict label "Roarable Sell — Weak Fundamentals / Trim." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 15 / 20 (ROIC 28.7%; FCF yield 4.92%). This is the strongest pillar relative to its maximum, and it indicates that the business generates a meaningful return on invested capital and a positive free-cash-flow yield, though the score is not high.
• Whale 13F Flow: 6 / 20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning). This is a weak reading, suggesting limited institutional tailwind per the rating's own measure.
• Insider Conviction: 18 / 20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow). This is the highest pillar score and is the main positive signal in the rating.
• Macro Regime Fit: 3 / 20 (beta 1.0; sector sensitivity). This is the weakest pillar, indicating the rating sees poor alignment between the stock and the current macro regime.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 14 / 20 (Altman Z 2.5; Piotroski F 7/9; Debt/Equity 0.5). Balance-sheet quality is reasonable and sits in the upper-middle of the scale.

For a prospective investor, the rating's overall message is caution. Upside drivers cited by the data are the cash-engine metrics and the insider-flow signal; the main drags are weak institutional positioning and poor macro-regime fit. Valuation, at a trailing P/E of 11.8 and forward P/E of 9.9, is low on earnings-based measures, which the investor should weigh against the rating's negative verdict and the thin 2024–2025 net-income history shown below. The rating is a model output and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.

Per the SEC financials, net income rose from $56.0M in FY 2024 to $273.0M in FY 2025 on revenue of $8449.0M, while FY 2024 free cash flow was $-112.0M and FY 2025 free cash flow was $159.0M. Reported operating income is $0.0M across all three periods, so operating margin cannot be assessed from the filings, and the market-data section lists gross and operating margins as 0%. The market data reports a net margin of 3.2%, ROIC of 28.7%, and an FCF yield of 4.92%. The rating cites an Altman Z-Score of 2.5, a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, and a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.5. Debt is listed as N/A in the filings, so the balance-sheet posture rests on these rating-level metrics.

Per the recent news wire, one item is listed: a Stock Traders Daily report titled "The Technical Signals Behind (CSTM) That Institutions Follow," flagged YELLOW under the MARKET WIRE impact label and published 1h before the data timestamp. The item is a general market-action and institutional-positioning piece; the source data does not provide its specific findings. The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph lists supply chain as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. Named risk watch items beyond the rating pillars are not available in source data.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is NONE, with no upstream or downstream links recorded and no proprietary signals. Upstream/downstream dependencies, sector correlations, and second-order bottlenecks are not available in source data. The only sector-level information provided is the Industrials/Metal Fabrications classification and a beta of 1.0 from the market data.

• What drives the FY 2025 jump in net income from $56.0M to $273.0M, and does operating income, which is reported as $0.0M, reflect a data-reporting gap?
• Why is debt listed as N/A in every reported period when the rating cites a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.5?
• What products, customers, and end markets generate Constellium's revenue?
• What specific institutional and options positioning underlies the 6/20 whale 13F pillar score?
• What findings does the single Stock Traders Daily item contain, and does it bear on the rating's macro-regime concerns?