Stoneridge Inc. (SRI) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, SRI scores 43 out of 100 (grade D-), with the verdict "Roarable Sell — Vulnerable Balance Sheet & Flow." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine (12/20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of -24.1% and an FCF yield of 19.55%. A high FCF yield alongside negative ROIC suggests cash generation is being measured against a shrinking or impaired capital base, so the yield should not be read as a clean value signal without confirming durability.
• Whale / 13F Flow (5/20): The lowest-scoring pillar, covering institutional accumulation and options positioning. The source data contains no holder or 13F detail, so the low score is the only available evidence of weak institutional conviction.
• Insider Conviction (9/20): Covers SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR flow. The source data does not itemize specific trades, so the investor cannot tell whether low insider conviction reflects selling, absence of buying, or both.
• Macro Regime Fit (6/20): Beta of 1.0 and a sector sensitivity profile. The Butterfly graph separately assigns a 2.32x liquidity elasticity, which implies the stock amplifies liquidity swings more than beta alone captures.
• Forensic Balance Sheet (11/20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, Altman Z 2.5, Piotroski F 4/9, Debt/Equity 0.5. The Z-score sits in a zone that warrants caution rather than distress, and the F-score is below midpoint, indicating weak fundamental health signals.

Investor implications: The upside case rests on the very high FCF yield and a $6.1 price sitting within a 52-week range of $4.6–$9.71, which could re-rate if operating losses narrow. Valuation tradeoffs are severe: with negative operating, net, and ROIC figures, earnings-based multiples are not available in source data, so valuation rests on cash-flow metrics whose sustainability is unproven. Second-order risk comes from liquidity sensitivity: a tightening liquidity backdrop could compress the stock disproportionately. This is an analytical framing, not personalized advice.

Stoneridge Inc. (SRI) is a NYSE-listed issuer in the Consumer Discretionary sector, operating in the Auto Parts: O.E.M. industry, per the profile section. Source data does not describe its specific products, end customers, or revenue model. Per the market data, gross margin is 19.9%, operating margin -4.5%, and net margin -11.9%. Source data does not describe how the company makes money beyond these margin figures.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined from $975.8M (FY 2023) to $861.3M (FY 2025), and net income deteriorated from $-5.2M to $-102.8M. Per the Roarable RQD rating, ROIC is -24.1%, and the Altman Z-Score is 2.5 and the Piotroski F-Score 4/9; Debt/Equity is listed as 0.5. Reported debt was $0.0M in FY 2024, and FY 2025 debt is not available in source data.

Per the recent news section, the wire contains six SRI items. The most notable catalyst is a headline reporting a Kodiak AI stock gain tied to a Stoneridge partnership announcement, rated GREEN. Other items are YELLOW market-wire notices, including scheduling of the Third Quarter 2026 results and earnings call, with the call set for 8 a.m. ET on Nov. 5, the day after the report, per the Stock Titan item. Per the Butterfly graph, the proprietary LIQUIDITY_TAILWIND signal carries a severity of 84, direction BEARISH, and a Macro Tailwind Score of 27/100. The signal cites a 2.32x Net Liquidity beta (r = +0.23) and a True Net Liquidity Index of $5,745.73B, down 0.64% over four weeks, with High-Yield OAS up 2 bps. Watch items are the Q3 earnings release and whether the partnership catalyst translates into reported results.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE and no butterfly links are present, so upstream and downstream dependencies cannot be mapped from the source data. The only sector-level linkage is the liquidity signal: the stock is classed as highly liquidity-sensitive, meaning a shift in net liquidity conditions could transmit to the share price with amplified magnitude. The Kodiak AI partnership headline is the only named counterparty, but the source does not describe the nature or dependency of that relationship. Second-order bottlenecks cannot be confirmed from the data provided.

• What drove the step-down from $12.8M operating income in FY 2023 to $-38.6M in FY 2025, and is the decline structural?
• What is the FY 2025 debt and EPS figure, which the source leaves unreported?
• What are the terms and economic significance of the Kodiak AI partnership?
• Does the 19.55% FCF yield reflect durable cash generation given negative ROIC and net losses?
• What is the consensus analyst view and recent insider or institutional activity, given that no such data is provided?